PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10118445

Assigning tasks effectively using a model.

Abstract

The clinical laboratory is a fast-paced environment where accuracy and efficiency are crucial. A major responsibility of the clinical manager is to assign tasks clearly to ensure that a quality job is done right the first time. Have you ever heard a manager say "This isn't what I asked for?" When this happens, it is usually the fault of the manager. Managers often make incorrect assumptions and do not take 100% of the responsibility for ensuring that assigned tasks are understood. To assign tasks effectively, managers must state exactly what they want, how they want it done, and when they want it. And, in addition to stating the desired end results, managers must verify that the directions were correctly understood; this is done by asking for feedback through questioning and paraphrasing. The five-step model described in this article will help you to assign tasks that get the job done right the first time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R N Lussier. Assigning tasks effectively using a model.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10118445/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗