PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10119945

Can knee replacements be assessed by post?

S Brewster·J Newman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The audit of knee replacement surgery requires long-term follow-up. The aim of this Bristol study was to examine whether an accurate assessment of knee replacement surgery could be undertaken by post, thus obviating the need for patients to visit hospital. A patient's questionnaire was designed to complement the clinic therapist's assessment form currently in use, and this was completed by 73 patients without supervision prior to the therapist's assessment. A comparison of the two assessments shows a significant discrepancy between their results, particularly in the assessment of pain, walking distance, and range of movement. The authors conclude that postal follow-up of knee replacements should be viewed with caution.

Explore related subjects

EnglandEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth Services ResearchHumansKnee ProsthesisOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionPostal ServiceState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Brewster, J Newman. 1991. Can knee replacements be assessed by post?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10119945/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Health inequalities in Scotland and England: the contrasting journeys of ideas from research into policy.

Both the UK's Labour Government and Scotland's devolved Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition Executive have committed themselves to reducing health inequalities. Furthermore, both institutions have emphasised the importance of using evidence to inform policy responses. In light of such political commitments, a significant amount of work has been undertaken in the field of health inequalities in order to: (i) review the available research evidence; (ii) assess the extent to which policies have been based on this research evidence; and (iii) evaluate the success (or failure) of policies to tackle health inequalities. Yet so far only limited attention has been given to exploring how key actors involved in research-policy dialogues understand the processes involved. In an attempt to address this gap, this article draws on data from semi-structured interviews with 58 key actors in the field of health inequalities research and policymaking in the UK to argue that it is ideas, rather than research evidence, which have travelled from research into policy. The descriptions of the varying journeys of these ideas fit three types--successful, partial and fractured--each of which is outlined with reference to one example. The paper then employs existing theories about research-policy relations and the movement of ideas in an attempt to illuminate and better understand the contrasting journeys. In the concluding discussion, it is argued that the third approach, which focuses on the entrepreneurial processes involved in the marketing of ideas, is most helpful in understanding the research findings, but that this needs to be discussed in relation to the political context within which negotiations take place.

England↗