PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10127554

Six honest serving men.

Abstract

The practice of medical-surgical nursing is "a dynamic, evolutionary process" and the proliferation of health care technology has been instrumental in its evolution. This proliferation and the goal of quality patient care in medical-surgical nursing practice are unlikely to change. However, the provision of quality care depends on the use of appropriate technology. Nurses and materiel managers working collaboratively can identify and promote the use of appropriate health care technology by applying the framework of technology assessment. This framework is analogous to Kipling's six honest serving men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who. The Elephant's Child What, Why, and When advise selective and judicious use of appropriate health care technology. How, Where, and Who reaffirm knowledgeable and proficient use with registered nurses, the patients' "link with the personal, human world within an impersonal, electronic world." Together, the six honest serving men emphasize that the primary purpose of health care technology is the improvement of human health "from the individual level through and including national health policy."

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E A McConnell. 1993. Six honest serving men.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10127554/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Low-cost on-the-job peer training of nurses improved immunization coverage in Indonesia.

In Indonesia responsibility for immunizations is placed on local government health centres and on the nurses who provide the immunizations at each centre. An on-the-job peer training programme for these nurses, which was designed to improve the immunization performance of poorly performing health centres in terms of coverage and practice in Maluku province, was evaluated. Experienced immunization nurses were sent to health centres where nurses were inexperienced or performing poorly; the experienced nurses spent 1-2 weeks providing on-the-job training for the less experienced ones. An evaluation of the 13 centres that participated in the programme and the 95 that did not found that the programme increased both immunization coverage and the quality of practice. Coverage of diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus (DPT), polio, and measles vaccinations rose by about 39% in all 13 participating centres when compared with non-participating centres, and by about 54% in the 11 centres that had a functioning transportation system during the year after training. These results reflect increases in the actual number of doses given and improvements in the accuracy of reports. Potential threats to the study's validity were examined and found not to be significant. The out-of-pocket cost of the training programme was about US$ 53 per trainee or about US$ 0.05 per additional vaccine reported to have been given. The marginal cost per additional fully immunized child was estimated to be US$ 0.50.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Cost-effectiveness of syringe exchange as an HIV prevention strategy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of New York State-approved syringe exchange programs (SEPs) and estimate the cost-saving potential of these programs. DESIGN AND METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis used cost and process data provided by seven SEPs for the calendar year 1996 or the most recent 12-month period available at the time of the study. Alternative estimates of the number of HIV infections prevented were calculated using published data and a simplified circulation model. HIV treatment costs were taken from the literature. RESULTS: A cost-effectiveness ratio of $20,947 per HIV infection averted was calculated based on an estimated 87 HIV infections averted across the seven programs and total program costs of $1.82 million (all amounts given in US dollars). Sensitivity analyses were also performed. Using imputed costs for donated services and estimates of lifetime costs to treat an HIV infection, syringe exchange was demonstrated to be a cost-saving strategy from a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates that syringe exchange is a cost-effective and cost-saving strategy for reducing HIV transmission.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Costeffectiveness of diagnostic tests.

We review the principles underlying cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic tests and procedures. We use two clinical examples, diagnostic testing for early multiple sclerosis and for Helicobacter pylori to illustrate the methods of analysis and to show how the results can be useful for physicians or payers of health services in making decisions about provision and use of diagnostic services. Economic assessments of diagnostic tests are inherently more difficult than assessments of therapeutic interventions, mainly because of uncertainty about the relation between diagnosis and end results (outcomes) of care. Nonetheless, because of the increasing importance of diagnostic technology in medicine and healthcare, only with such assessments will the most value be gained from restricted medical resources.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗