A chronic disease prevention program.

D Grillo

doi:10.1300/j045v05n01_07

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10128265

A chronic disease prevention program.

D Grillo

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a pilot chronic disease prevention program at the Hinds County Health Department in Jackson, Mississippi, 1030 patients were evaluated with yearly complete physical evaluation, Pap Smears, screening mammography, and other appropriate tests and procedures. The patients were also provided with nutritional and healthy lifestyle education. The study lasted for 3 1/2 years. It was done in conjunction with a pre-existing hypertension program. Although the benefits of the educational effort were more intangible in the relatively short period of time of the study, it is significant that mammography identified eight (8) occult breast cancers. We believe this pilot study only touches the surface of what could be done with more extensive preventive measures.

Explore related subjects

Chronic Disease Cost-Benefit Analysis Data Collection Female Health Care Costs Health Education Humans Male Mammography Mississippi Pilot Projects Planning Techniques Preventive Health Services Program Evaluation Public Health Administration Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D Grillo. 1993. A chronic disease prevention program.. https://doi.org/10.1300/j045v05n01_07

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Chronic headache: New advances in treatment strategies.

Chronic daily headache (CDH) affects approximately 4 to 5% of the population and encompasses a number of different diagnoses, including transformed migraine, chronic tension-type headache (TTH), new-onset daily persistent headache, and hemicrania continua. Although the pathophysiology of CDH is still poorly understood, some research has suggested that each of the various subtypes of CDH may have a different pathogenesis. The goals of prophylactic therapy are to reduce the frequency, severity, and duration of headache attacks; to improve responsiveness to treatment of acute attacks; to improve function; and to reduce disability. However, opinions differ as to exactly which are the best and most appropriate outcome measures for prophylaxis. Several pharmacologic treatment options exist, including antidepressants, anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, serotonin agonists, ergots, serotonin antagonists, antianxiety agents, and other miscellaneous drugs. Tizanidine, an alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist, has recently emerged as a promising prophylactic adjunct for CDH, which implicates a central alpha(2)-adrenergic mechanism as an important factor in the pathophysiology of CDH.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed2002

Surgery of chronic pancreatitis: chronicle of confusion and despair.

The evolution of surgery for pancreatitic disease has been arduous owing to the technical difficulties of addressing the organ and the lack of understanding the mechanisms of the disease processes involving it. In particular, the tardy advance of surgery in the management of chronic pancreatitis exemplifies these problems. Because no specific target has been identified, mechanical intervention has for the most part reflected intuitive or creative attempts to address perceived pathologic issues such as sphincter disease, calculi, and fibrotic masses. The past and present remain a confusion of etiologies and diagnoses. Treatment remains for the most part a dramatically disappointing scenario, and both patients and their physicians are frustrated. Although the remarkable technologic progress exhibited by the odyssey of operative strategy from simple drainage, to ductal drainage, to the complex refinements of extensive resection is a testimonial to surgical skill and determination, it has been nullified to a large extent by the inability to address the initiating factors of the disease or alter those that engender progress of the pathology. It is not unreasonable to recognize that we are facing an enigmatic disease process generically classified as "chronic pancreatitis" for want of any more specific terminology. In the light of our current knowledge and experience, intervention should probably be modest in the extreme and limited to centers and individuals with expertise or who are involved in specific studies to determine the precise criteria and techniques necessary for optimum intervention. It is important that when charting such a course future surgeons involved in the management of chronic pancreatitis have an understanding of the historical evolution of the subject. As Theodor Billroth, the greatest of the surgical innovators remarked: "An awareness of the past is necessary to comprehend the present, and without it no consideration of the future is possible."

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed2002

Treatment of chronic lower back pain with lumbar extension and whole-body vibration exercise: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up period was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To compare lumbar extension exercise and whole-body vibration exercise for chronic lower back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic lower back pain involves muscular as well as connective and neural systems. Different types of physiotherapy are applied for its treatment. Industrial vibration is regarded as a risk factor. Recently, vibration exercise has been developed as a new type of physiotherapy. It is thought to activate muscles via reflexes. METHODS: In this study, 60 patients with chronic lower back pain devoid of "specific" spine diseases, who had a mean age of 51.7 years and a pain history of 13.1 years, practiced either isodynamic lumbar extension or vibration exercise for 3 months. Outcome measures were lumbar extension torque, pain sensation (visual analog scale), and pain-related disability (pain disability index). RESULTS: A significant and comparable reduction in pain sensation and pain-related disability was observed in both groups. Lumbar extension torque increased significantly in the vibration exercise group (30.1 Nm/kg), but significantly more in the lumbar extension group (+59.2 Nm/kg; SEM 10.2; P < 0.05). No correlation was found between gain in lumbar torque and pain relief or pain-related disability (P > 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The current data indicate that poor lumbar muscle force probably is not the exclusive cause of chronic lower back pain. Different types of exercise therapy tend to yield comparable results. Interestingly, well-controlled vibration may be the cure rather than the cause of lower back pain.

Chronic Disease↗