PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10143135

Scheduling: if your RIS cannot, perhaps your HIS can.

Abstract

As the services radiology departments provide have proliferated--new modalities, additional procedures--the scheduling process has become more complex. Radiology departments have been criticized by referring physicians and their staff for difficulties they encounter when scheduling patients for procedures. In light of managed care and increased competition for outpatient services, scheduling systems should be designed with the referring physician's office as the prime customer. Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) has devised a collaborative, hospital-wide system for scheduling. The same system is used by The Vanderbilt Clinics, which refer a significant number of outpatient procedures to VUMC. The radiology department has tailored the system to its technical requirements, and clinic staff members can access the system directly to schedule patient appointments. Minor adjustments were made during implementation of the process. Now, appointments are made efficiently by the clinic staff, and other systems, such as the film library, are benefiting from better information and organization. VUMC has changed the scheduling process of the radiology department to reach the customers who actually promote the radiology practice. Communication between the department and the clinics has improved and a spirit of teamwork is growing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W M Rowe, M E Moffitt, W J Bunnell. 1995. Scheduling: if your RIS cannot, perhaps your HIS can.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10143135/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rationing healthcare in New Zealand: the use of clinical guidelines.

A 1991 "Green and White Paper", Your health and the public health. A statement of government health policy, advised that healthcare services in New Zealand could be rationed by a simple list. The Health and Disability Services Act 1993 provided a framework for resource allocation. The Core Services Committee rejected the "Oregon approach" of using a simple list to determine what condition/treatment pairs should be funded, preferring the development of clinical guidelines as a basis for assessment. Clinical priority assessment criteria derived from guidelines are used to define the degree of clinical benefit for public funding. Criteria have been developed for entry into end-stage renal failure programs, access to coronary artery surgery, and entry into booking systems for other elective services. The development of clinical criteria to define access to services has had a difficult road, but is a start in defining public expectations of New Zealand's healthcare system.

Appointments and Schedules↗

Health care refugees.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Appointments and Schedules↗

Health care for sale.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Appointments and Schedules↗