PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10145703

What derived variables should be monitored during mechanical ventilation?

Abstract

Without a careful definition, it is very difficult to propose a list of essential derived variables that should be monitored during mechanical ventilation. The list of essentials will vary not only with disease type and severity but also with the expertise of the operator in interpreting the data, and willingness to incorporate it into his/her surveillance and treatment plan. It can be cogently argued that the only variables of crucial significance to the vast majority of patients are the primary ones--airway pressure, flow, tidal volume, and minute ventilation. My own view is that end-inspiratory (PD, Ps, and Pz), end-expiratory (total PEEP), and mean airway pressures must be checked at frequent intervals, especially in ARDS. Partitioning of the total pressure into its flow-driving and elastance-counterbalancing components is always wise, whether or not resistance and compliance or elastance are formally calculated. Incremental changes in the pressure-volume relationship should be monitored whenever adjustments in PEEP or VT are made. Ventilatory demand, strength, and power-reserve assessment are often instrumental in the care of the ventilator-dependent patient who presents as a weaning problem. The most valuable indicators of these include the VE, the maximum voluntary inspiratory pressure, and the frequency-to-tidal-volume ratio. Measurements of the work of breathing, P0.1, and Pes should be reserved for unusually difficult clinical questions. Finally, the variability of the Paw tracing yields valuable data regarding the synchrony of patient-ventilator interactions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Marini. 1992. What derived variables should be monitored during mechanical ventilation?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10145703/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗