PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10150666

Technology assessment and coverage decision making.

Abstract

In the health care decision-making cascade, technology assessment renders the initial evaluative judgement about the contribution of a technology to patient care. As such, it has a major impact on coverage policy, clinical guidelines and utilization management. This impact necessitates that technology assessment have a scientific, defensible process. There are four basic components of a scientific, defensible process for both clinical and coverage decision making. These are: 1. Outcomes data that are derived preferably from controlled clinical trials and that support the safety and effectiveness of a specific indication 2. Evidence of acceptance by the practicing medical community of specific applications of a technology 3. A rigorous, evaluative process that synthesizes and analyzes outcomes data and expert opinion 4. Consistency in the use of terminology, as it is translated from the technology assessment process to coverage policy The process must be designed to assure scientific and methodological defensibility. Also, it must be designed to facilitate and substantiate the medical and coverage decision-making processes. Finally, it must be designed to enable and expedite the implementation of the managed care philosophy (i.e., outcomes-based decision making) within a particular health plan.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W T McGivney. Technology assessment and coverage decision making.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10150666/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Low-cost on-the-job peer training of nurses improved immunization coverage in Indonesia.

In Indonesia responsibility for immunizations is placed on local government health centres and on the nurses who provide the immunizations at each centre. An on-the-job peer training programme for these nurses, which was designed to improve the immunization performance of poorly performing health centres in terms of coverage and practice in Maluku province, was evaluated. Experienced immunization nurses were sent to health centres where nurses were inexperienced or performing poorly; the experienced nurses spent 1-2 weeks providing on-the-job training for the less experienced ones. An evaluation of the 13 centres that participated in the programme and the 95 that did not found that the programme increased both immunization coverage and the quality of practice. Coverage of diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus (DPT), polio, and measles vaccinations rose by about 39% in all 13 participating centres when compared with non-participating centres, and by about 54% in the 11 centres that had a functioning transportation system during the year after training. These results reflect increases in the actual number of doses given and improvements in the accuracy of reports. Potential threats to the study's validity were examined and found not to be significant. The out-of-pocket cost of the training programme was about US$ 53 per trainee or about US$ 0.05 per additional vaccine reported to have been given. The marginal cost per additional fully immunized child was estimated to be US$ 0.50.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Home care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗