PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10153736

HCFA issues final Stark I rules.

Abstract

While final rules clarify many "gray" areas of statutory interpretation under Stark I, some questions of interpretation under this law will remain largely unanswered until further Stark II regulations are issued. Thus, the health care industry is without definitive guidance on many issues. It must continue to make "best guesses" in interpreting the intent of the statute. However, bad guesses could mean imposition of severe penalties, including recoupment and substantial civil money penalties for making prohibited referrals. Moreover, the regulations confirm the Department of Health and Human Services' position that no advisory opinions are available. Because the final regulations were not issued until after the effective dates of the Stark Law, yet another round of restructuring may be required to effect regulatory compliance and avoid imposition of penalties. "Health Law" is a regular feature of Physician Executive from the Washington, D.C., law firm Epstein Becker & Green. Mark Lutes of that law firm serves as editor of the column.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Matyas. 1995. HCFA issues final Stark I rules.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10153736/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Risks of a large group practice: a personal experience.

Formation of a large orthopaedic group practice and practicing within this group carries many risks that are not present in a small group practice. The current authors will discuss the complexity of merging groups, forming corporate policy, hiring executive administrative staff, contracting issues with insurance companies, expanding services and developing ancillary income sources, and the complex interpersonal relationships of a large group practice.

Group Practice↗