PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10153769

Benchmarking and networking through collaborative groups.

Abstract

The search for better ways to deliver healthcare services at lower cost led a group of hospitals in the Carolinas, 2 years ago, to pioneer a new concept, the collaborative group. A collaborative group typically is composed of five or six similar (but not competing) hospitals that work together closely to help each other make the changes necessary to survive in an increasingly competitive marketplace. Hospital staff members at all levels are able to work together to discover improvement opportunities through benchmarking teams and networking efforts. This article describes their experiences, achievements, and lessons learned.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Hodges, L Kelley, A Wilkes. Benchmarking and networking through collaborative groups.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.1996.tb00820.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Relative effects of external and internal factors on emergency department efficiency].

BACKGROUND: To know the relative effect of external and internal factors on emergency department (ED) efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Along 3 consecutive weeks we compute at 3 hours-interval the number or patient waiting for visit and the mean waiting time for visit (efficiency markers), the number of patients arriving to ED (external pressure marker) and the number of patients remaining in ED after beginning the visit (internal pressure marker), which was divided in ED-related factors, hospital-related factors, ED-hospital interelation-related factors, or not caused by ED nor hospital-related factors. RESULTS: Only the increase of internal pressure was associated with a decline in ED efficiency (p < 0.001). ED-related and hospital-related factors were those significantly associated with such a decline (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Internal pressure generated by the own ED exerts a prominent role in its dysfunction; therefore, policies addressed to reduce such internal pressure should be encouraged.

Efficiency, Organizational↗

Operating theatres. Cutting edge.

An enhanced postoperative theatre recovery unit can provide overnight intensive care for surgical patients. Most recovery units could be adapted for this purpose. Set-up capital costs are lower than for developing separate stand-alone facilities. 24-hour staffing is required for each OIR bed, although weekend cover can be downgraded to normal recover staffing, according to demand. Overnight intensive recovery and the ICU must collaborate in critical care provision.

Efficiency, Organizational↗