PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10154054

Trends in specialty certification.

Abstract

From 1980 to 1994, 283,024 certificates were issued by the 23 specialty boards. Of these certificates, 137,852 (48.7%) were issued in primary care specialties, 84,993 (30.0%) were certificates in the other medical specialties, and 60,179 (21.2%) were certificates in the surgical specialties. The figure on page 26 illustrates the changes that have occurred in the pool of board-certified physicians from 1980 to 1994. Since 1980, the number of certificates issued in the primary care specialties and the number of certificates issued in the other medical specialties has consistently exceeded those issued in the surgical specialties. In 1977, Mr. James Haug, Director, ACS Socioeconomic Affairs Department, correctly predicted that the pool of board-certified surgeons as a percentage of the total pool of board-certified physicians would decline. In 1980, the total number of certificates issued by the 23 specialty boards was 16,034. Surgical specialty certificates accounted for 23.8 percent of the total number of certificates issued by the 23 specialty boards in 1980. In 1994, the total number of certificates issued by the 23 specialty boards was 22,090. Surgical specialty certificates accounted for 19.8 percent of the total number of certificates issued by the 23 specialty boards in 1994. In 1980, 1984, 1986, and 1989 primary care specialty certificates accounted for greater than 50.0 percent of the total number of certificates issued by the 23 specialty boards in those years. Given the substantial growth in the number of certificates in the primary care and other medical specialties depicted in the figure, certificates in the surgical specialties as a percentage of the total number of certificates has remained stable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W F Seward. 1995. Trends in specialty certification.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10154054/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗