PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10160342

Restructuring critical care services. Part III: Successful implementation preparation.

Abstract

Successful implementation in a redesigning organization does not happen without a sound design, good implementation planning and effective leadership. The focus of the implementation preparation must change prior to and after the "go live" implementation date. Implementation preparation requires intentional steps to build systems, communicate effectively and develop operational understanding among clinicians, physicians and management. Early effort should focus on planning for efficient day-to-day operations, development of measurement systems and contingency planning. Immediately prior to and after implementation the focus should be on communication, goal setting, issues prioritization and fact-based issues resolution. After the first couple of months of implementation, the focus should move toward mentoring teams/individuals, building outcome measurement systems, identifying sources of future improvement and transferring more authority as appropriate to teams. Commit to comprehensive implementation preparation. Time spent on implementation preparation will pay large dividends during the challenging times of transitioning your organization to a redesigned world.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T G Williams, C P Harmon. 1996. Restructuring critical care services. Part III: Successful implementation preparation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10160342/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗