PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10160857

Developing loyal physicians: a five-point plan.

R E Thompson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Now, more than ever, health care centers are forced to compete for physicians. There could be no greater argument in favor of establishing the position of Vice President for Medical Services. A physician executive is infinitely more qualified and better prepared to understand the probable reaction of different types of physicians when "loyalty" to the organization is the central issue. The Vice President for Medical Services seems best positioned to remind the Chief Executive Officer and the Board to keep sight of the legal, and moral, duty to "exercise reasonable care in the selection of a medical staff and in granting specialized privileges," including selecting practitioners who are "worthy in character and matters of professional ethics."

Explore related subjects

Ethics, MedicalHumansInterprofessional RelationsMarketing of Health ServicesMedical Staff, HospitalPersonnel LoyaltyPhysician ExecutivesPhysician Incentive PlansPlanning TechniquesUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R E Thompson. Developing loyal physicians: a five-point plan.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10160857/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

When norms normalize: the case of genetic "enhancement".

As the possibility of genetic intervention becomes more concrete, defining and regulating ethically permissible interventions must include a consideration of the implicit as well as explicit consequences. These include the moral implications of defining "enhancement" by reference to a standard of normality. Some authors have called into question the standard ethical concerns about genetic enhancement, but the distinction between enhancing and therapeutic interventions is still structured as relatively unproblematic. However, determining the boundary between therapy and enhancement will have feedback effects on the socially implemented definitions of what counts as normal in human embodiment. Positioning the interface between permissible and nonpermissible interventions at the same place as the boundaries between therapy and enhancement, and between normal and abnormal embodiment, (1) uses biology to justify a moral evaluation, (2) privileges the single standpoint of the genetically canonical person, and (3) enhances the dichotomy between "normal" and "not normal". Assuming that the limit of permissibility along the interventional continuum is coterminous with the definitions of enhancement and of normality, distracts from the work of uncovering the real grounds to setting limits to genetic manipulation.

Ethics, Medical↗
PubMed2001

Ethical dilemmas in communicating medical information to the public.

This paper examines arguments for and against objective communication between health-care experts (HCEs) and the public concerning matters of health and disease. It argues that HCEs should have neither a purely objective approach nor a paternalistic approach to communications with the public. The informed consent model is the best way to promote public health, prevent disease, respect individual autonomy, and safeguard scientific honesty and openness. In following this model, HCEs should provide lay people with the information and advice they need to make sound decisions. They should not manipulate, distort, exaggerate, or conceal relevant information, nor should they use coercive means to induce the 'correct' decisions. Paternalistic communication only makes sense under the extraordinary challenges posed by bona fide public-health emergencies. Of course, informed people may still make unwise choices, but this is a cost that one must accept in a free, open, and democratic society.

Ethics, Medical↗