PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10161283

CEO behavioral pattern expectations for physician executives.

N S Seibert·R W Singleton
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This is a report on the second part of a two-stage survey. The first part of the survey, reported in the Nov. 1994 issue of Physician Executive, dealt with physician executive behavior tendencies as viewed from the perspective of physicians, largely in hospitals. In the follow-up portion of the survey, the views of hospital CEOs on this subject were sought. CEOs were also asked for their views on the roles of physician executives and on what they were seeking in physician leaders. CEOs were asked to assess these issues in terms of the ideal physician executive, not the persons currently holding such positions in their organizations. Finally, this second report draws on the results of both parts of the survey in order to make comparisons between the views of the two groups of managers.

Explore related subjects

Attitude of Health PersonnelBehaviorChief Executive Officers, HospitalData CollectionHealth Services ResearchHospital-Physician RelationsHospitals, UrbanHumansLeadershipPhysician ExecutivesPhysician's RoleUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N S Seibert, R W Singleton. 1996. CEO behavioral pattern expectations for physician executives.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10161283/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Professional attitudes to Changing Childbirth in Nottingham, UK.

Changing Childbirth has been a central focus of maternity care policy in England. The objective of this study was to determine whether different professional groups involved in maternity care-hospital and community midwives, general practitioners and obstetricians-had different professional attitudes to a local implementation scheme. Data were obtained using a postal questionnaire, based on an agenda developed from focus groups. Whilst general practitioners appeared to be somewhat less optimistic than were midwives, there existed clear differences of opinion within the midwifery profession itself, depending upon whether the midwife worked in the community or in hospital. All professionals appeared conscious of the gap between the service ideals and the limited resources available to achieve them, and expressed uncertainty over future directions and ways of working.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2002

A Quebec survey of issues in cancer pain management.

We report the results of a cancer pain survey mailed to Quebec hematologist-oncologists and palliative care physicians in 1999. The survey was designed to sample views on the current status of pain management and on obstacles to the provision of adequate pain relief for patients. The survey, formulated by an ethics network centered at the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, was distributed to all members of the Association of Hematologist-Oncologists of Quebec and to all physician members of the Quebec Palliative Care Association. Responses were obtained from 138 Palliative Care Association members (response rate 61%) and 76 hematologist-oncologists (response rate 45%). Major obstacles reported included inadequate assessment of both contributory psychosocial issues and severity of pain, patient reluctance to take opioids, and inadequate access to non-drug techniques for pain relief. Access to opioids was not regarded as a problem. Both groups felt generally competent in their ability to manage various aspects of cancer pain therapy. They gave little credit to their formal medical school or residency training. Fifty-six percent of the palliative care group and 57% of the hemato-oncologists rated their medical school experience as only "poor" or "fair" on a 4-point scale. Residency ratings were modestly better. We conclude that medical faculties should assign a high priority to teaching health professionals patient assessment techniques. Simple symptom assessment scales should be routinely used in oncology/palliative care practice. Medical school training in pain management is not highly regarded and should be enhanced. We also note that, based on response to the scenario of a patient presenting with severe pain, many physicians, while feeling competent in the use of opioids, may be overly conservative in their initial use.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2002

Nurses and English primary care groups: their experiences and perceived influence on policy development.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To investigate the experiences and perceived influence of nurses serving on English primary care group boards. BACKGROUND: The development of the nursing workforce and nursing services in primary care have been piecemeal and nurses have not always contributed to policy development. The recent establishment of primary care groups (PCGs) in the United Kingdom (UK) potentially offers nurses the opportunity to take a concerted and strategic role in developing professional roles and planning service developments. RESEARCH METHODS: As part of a longitudinal study of a 15% random sample of English primary care groups, nurse board members were surveyed in the winter of 1999. One hundred and forty-four nurses were invited to return self-completion questionnaires. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 106 of those invited to participate (73%). Respondents reported that combining their usual work with their role in the PCG was frequently difficult. Only 26% perceived that they had been well prepared for their new role. Compared with other board members [for example, general practitioners (GPs)], nurses perceived that their own influence was limited, with only a quarter rating the influence of nurses on decision-making as great. Most of the sample were feeding back information to other primary care and community nurses working in the locality and 52% rated communication with this wider constituency as good or better. Nurse board members were enthusiastic about their role and optimistic about the positive future impact of PCGs on health. CONCLUSIONS: PCGs are still at a relatively early stage in their development. It is still too early to assess their impact on nurses working in primary care and community settings. Board membership offers nurses a voice in local health policy development.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗