PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10162877

Value management: decision making using the value paradigm.

Abstract

Health care delivery systems must address the sometimes conflicting expectations of its stakeholders. The people who pay for the service or a set of benefits are not always the people who receive the service. The challenge is to meet the expectations of the patient for high quality and to meet the expectations of the employer and/or insurance plan for low costs. We are no longer managing just quality. We are managing the total value of service from the perspective of out stakeholders. Stakeholder satisfaction is defined as achieving or exceeding the stakeholder's expectations from the resources committed. An operational definition of value is useful in helping administrators and physicians to focus on the interactions of the key management variables of cost, effectiveness, efficiency and access. The development of decision models based on these key variables is a helpful tool for quantifying the value of the decision from the perspective of each stakeholder.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J S Hagen. Value management: decision making using the value paradigm.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10162877/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rationing healthcare in New Zealand: the use of clinical guidelines.

A 1991 "Green and White Paper", Your health and the public health. A statement of government health policy, advised that healthcare services in New Zealand could be rationed by a simple list. The Health and Disability Services Act 1993 provided a framework for resource allocation. The Core Services Committee rejected the "Oregon approach" of using a simple list to determine what condition/treatment pairs should be funded, preferring the development of clinical guidelines as a basis for assessment. Clinical priority assessment criteria derived from guidelines are used to define the degree of clinical benefit for public funding. Criteria have been developed for entry into end-stage renal failure programs, access to coronary artery surgery, and entry into booking systems for other elective services. The development of clinical criteria to define access to services has had a difficult road, but is a start in defining public expectations of New Zealand's healthcare system.

Appointments and Schedules↗

Health care refugees.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Appointments and Schedules↗