PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10163437

A framework for cost-sharing policy analysis.

Abstract

To assess the effect of cost sharing, a framework for describing and evaluating cost-sharing programmes was constructed, followed by a comprehensive search of the international literature on the subject. The results indicated that cost sharing carries many potential advantages, one of which includes increased consumer attention to healthcare costs. However, proper design of cost-sharing programmes is necessary to mitigate regressivity and other common problems associated with many current programmes. These findings should help policy makers to understand and anticipate the effects of cost sharing, and to create innovative benefit design solutions that are targeted to promote health system goals.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Rubin, D N Mendelson. 1996. A framework for cost-sharing policy analysis.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199600102-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Health insurance: tradeoffs revisited.

In two recent papers, [Journal of Health Economics 18(2), 141-152, Journal of Health Economics 18(6), 811-824] Nyman raised some questions about the welfare calculations and conclusions in our earlier paper [Manning and Marquis, Health insurance: the tradeoff between risk pooling and moral hazard, Vol. 15, 1996]. This note discusses the erroneous criticisms in his papers. First, although, we estimated a Marshallian demand curve, our calculations are based on compensating variations that incorporate the gains from risk pooling. Second, our estimates of second best insurance plans indicate that some cost sharing is optimal, in contradiction to his assertion that our results raise questions about the desirability of insurance coverage. The comment also deals with other issues raised by Nyman.

Cost Sharing↗