PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10165338

Current issues in telepathology.

Abstract

Telepathology involves rendering diagnostic opinions on specimens at remote locations using computer and telecommunications technologies. Consultations are a routine practice pattern in pathology, as there is a large amount of diagnostic and prognostic information available from the examination of biopsy material that requires an extensive knowledge of diseases and their clinical implications. Pathologists therefore frequently request opinions from those who subspecialize in various diseases. The use of video technology to examine and consult on microscopical slides has been validated, although sparsely and with a number of technical issues as yet unresolved. There are two principal paradigms for telepathology: remote dynamic screening by robotic video microscopy and remote diagnosis from selected still video microscopical images. The former is more appealing to most pathologists; however, it requires very high speed telecommunications links that are expensive and may not be available in a given location. The latter method entails a significant reduction in the data on which the diagnosis is rendered, as one is dependent on the fields selected at the remote location. In addition, there are hybrid systems that combine limited robotic capabilities with high-resolution still images. Image compression can increase the number of images that can be transmitted over an otherwise-limiting telecommunications infrastructure. JPEG is the current standard for such compression. Despite certain limitations, telepathology has been demonstrated successfully at several sites around the world. As this technology matures, systems will offer higher resolution, standardization of file formats, and better compression at lower cost.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Black-Schaffer, T J Flotte. 1995. Current issues in telepathology.. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.95

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

NHSnet in Scottish primary care: lessons for the future.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the primary care communications initiative, which introduced NHSnet to primary care in Scotland. DESIGN: Semi-structured telephone interviews, postal questionnaire. SETTING: All 15 Scottish health boards, random sample of 1 in 3 of all Scottish general practices. PARTICIPANTS: Information management and technology managers of health boards, 355 practice managers in the general practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variations between health boards in styles of project management, means of connection to NHSnet, costs to general practices, and training provided. Practices' levels of participation in initiative, initial use of NHSnet, and factors acting as incentives and disincentives to use of NHSnet. RESULTS: 99% of Scottish general practices agreed to participate in initiative. Health boards varied significantly in project management styles (from minimal to total control), the nature of the networks they established (intranets or direct connections), costs to practices (from nothing to pound125 per general practitioner per year), and training provided (from none to an extensive programme). In 56% of practices someone accessed NHSnet at least once a week. Practices varied considerably in amount of internet training received and staff groups targeted and in the intention to provide desktop access to NHSnet through a practice network. CONCLUSION: The initiative has successfully introduced a network that links Scottish general practices, health boards, and hospital trusts. However local variation in this "national" initiative may affect its use in primary care. Health authorities and general practices in England and Wales may wish to note these findings in order to avoid unhelpful variation.

Computer Communication Networks↗