PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10165385

Comparability and compatibility: issues in combining data from central cancer registries.

Abstract

Before combining or comparing data from different registries, one should consider similarities and differences in data collection methods, data quality, and underlying populations. What are important population demographic differences? What about differences in data quality: How can these be measured and evaluated? What factors can affect data compatibility? How can one assess data comparability? If registries are compatible, are they always comparable? Are comparable data from registries compatible data? When data are combined, what issues should be considered to determine whether the combined result is meaningful? These are some of the common questions that need to be addressed to determine whether and when data from different registries should be combined or compared.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H L Howe. 1997. Comparability and compatibility: issues in combining data from central cancer registries.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10165385/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗