PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10170147

Developing radiology procedure cost standards.

Abstract

Containing costs is at the forefront of healthcare management, particularly as managed care replaces fee-for-service care. The first step in costs is to gain an understanding of the "building blocks" or components of procedure costs. The department of radiology at Duke University Medical Center and Health System, in conjunction with the department of management engineering, developed labor and supply standards to predict direct procedure costs throughout the radiology department, where 285,000 procedures are performed annually. This team concept resulted in a consistent approach to building procedure standards that predict direct costs across all sections. Step by step instructions are given for the following standards. Variable labor standards represent the average amount of staff time required for each procedure. Variable supply standards represent the average amount of consumable supply resources required per procedure. Fixed labor time standards predict the amount of fixed time resources necessary to operate the department of radiology at Duke University hospital. Cost per procedure uses the standards developed in the other sections. These basic steps will help readers determine their own direct costs per procedure for most radiology procedures (excluding capital and indirect costs). When these standards and costs are identified, the next step is to identify the areas to reduce such costs without affecting the quality of patient care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Helsper, J G Cesari. Developing radiology procedure cost standards.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10170147/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modelling strategies for reducing pharmaceutical costs in hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To describe drug utilization and cost in a large hospital and to compare the impact of different strategies on cost associated with drug prescribing. DESIGN: Retrospective data on drug utilization and cost, linked to patient clinical data and prescriber data from November 1998 were analyzed and modelled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact of different strategies for cost control. SETTING: A large hospital in Sydney, Australia. RESULTS: The mean cost of drugs per episode of care was 28 Australian dollars. Of all drug costs, 79% was incurred by medical units and 14% by surgical units. Oncology accounted for 42% and inpatients for 91% of drug costs. Although section-100 (S-100) drugs incurred a high cost (640 dollars) per episode of care, there were only 41 episodes where S-100 drugs (expensive, restricted drugs) were used, and the total cost of S-100 drugs was only 3.7% of the total cost to the hospital. Antibiotics were the most commonly prescribed drug category, prescribed in 14% of all hospital episodes, and accounting for 14% of total drug costs. Anti-ulcer drugs were the next most costly group, accounting for 7% of total drug costs. A 20% reduction in use of antibiotics would save four times that (233,832 dollars pa) of a 20% reduction in use of S-100 drugs (61,392 dollars pa). DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that reducing inappropriate use of high volume drugs such as antibiotics could be more effective in optimising health facility drug budgets than attempts concentrating solely on reducing use of high cost drugs alone. Moreover our study suggests that systematic measurement of drug utilisation patterns is a key element of drug cost control strategies.

Cost Allocation↗