PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10171798

Ergonomics for the laboratory. A guide for developing appropriate procedures.

Abstract

In Section 5(a)(1) "General Duty Clause," The Occupational Safety and Health Administration enforces the guidelines that assist employers in preventing ergonomic disorders through sound safety and health programs. These guidelines are advisory in nature and are intended to be adapted to the needs and resources of each laboratory facility to reduce unnecessary workman's compensation claims. The Clinical Laboratory Management Association (CLMA) prepared this guide to assist employers in developing appropriate procedures in their laboratories. Although the information in this article is compiled from sources and documents believed to be reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed nor is any responsibility assumed or implied for any damage or loss resulting from inaccuracies or omissions. CLMA and the author are not engaged in rendering legal advice. Any legal questions should be discussed with an attorney.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T J Gile. Ergonomics for the laboratory. A guide for developing appropriate procedures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10171798/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

On health, ability and activity: comments on some basic notions in the ICF.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to highlight and at the same time criticize the holistic view of health expressed in the "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)". Particular attention will be paid to the idea suggested in the ICF that not only the ability to perform a specified action but also its actual performance is included in the person's health. My argument intends to show that this is an untenable position. METHOD: The theoretical platform of this paper is philosophical action theory. My argument makes particular use of the distinctions between ability, opportunity, activity and will. My analysis also uses some insights from the contemporary philosophical discussion of health concepts. CONCLUSIONS: Ability (or capacity) and its opposite disability (or incapacity) are essential ingredients in the implicit philosophy of health of the ICF. However, the ICF also puts an emphasis on the actual performance of actions. This is entailed by the performance qualifier that is included in the ICF. I give some arguments for questioning the relevance of this qualifier if it is intended to have a place in the concept of health or have a general function for decisions in health care or rehabilitation. Instead I suggest the introduction of an opportunity qualifier, which could fulfill some of the purposes intended for the performance qualifier.

Persons with Disabilities↗