PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10172205

Risk management tips for video technology.

Abstract

Proper management of the videotaping of medical procedures begins with identifying the purpose of the video; determining whether it is educational, diagnostic-related, or for "public relations" purposes; and obtaining a clearly defined consent that addresses an understanding of all risks and expectations involved. Although an exception to the policy may become necessary in some instances, addressing the key issues in policies and procedures before taping is the key to minimizing risks. Videotapes are useful as a teaching tool, but they also can easily become a part of the discovery process in a malpractice suit. Given the current nature of discovery in most states, many courts would require disclosure of the videotape. Although this may be disturbing to many health care providers, it should also be considered that the videotape could contain a valid record that the procedure was performed correctly, clearing the physician or facility involved of charges of negligence. With video cameras in such common use today, a positive, proactive position on the benefits involved in videotaping should be taken to minimize the potential negative ramifications that could occur.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Pickering. 1995. Risk management tips for video technology.. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.5600150104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of teamwork training on the occurrence of adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery. METHODS: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted at seven intervention and eight control hospitals. The intervention was a standardized teamwork training curriculum based on crew resource management that emphasized communication and team structure. The primary outcome was the proportion of deliveries at 20 weeks or more of gestation in which one or more adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes or both occurred (Adverse Outcome Index). Additional outcomes included 11 clinical process measures. RESULTS: A total of 1,307 personnel were trained and 28,536 deliveries analyzed. At baseline, there were no differences in demographic or delivery characteristics between the groups. The mean Adverse Outcome Index prevalence was similar in the control and intervention groups, both at baseline and after implementation of teamwork training (9.4% versus 9.0% and 7.2% versus 8.3%, respectively). The intracluster correlation coefficient was 0.015, with a resultant wide confidence interval for the difference in mean Adverse Outcome Index between groups (-5.6% to 3.2%). One process measure, the time from the decision to perform an immediate cesarean delivery to the incision, differed significantly after team training (33.3 minutes versus 21.2 minutes, P=.03). CONCLUSION: Training, as was conducted and implemented, did not transfer to a detectable impact in this study. The Adverse Outcome Index could be an important tool for comparing obstetric outcomes within and between institutions to help guide quality improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), NCT00381056 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Delivery, Obstetric↗