PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10172797

The Rochester Consortium.

Abstract

The laboratories of the six hospitals in Rochester, New York worked together to bid on laboratory services for local managed-care contracts. Their primary goal was to keep shrinking health-care dollars in the Rochester community while providing quality laboratory services for managed-care payers. The six laboratory providers formed a cooperative Consortium that enabled them to compete successfully with national commercial laboratories for referral laboratory testing for outpatients and nonpatients. In 1995, the Consortium was approached by a Rochester-based health maintenance organization (HMO) offering an exclusive contract opportunity based on requirements that included cost reduction and a switch from a fee schedule to a capitated payment method. The Rochester laboratories each agreed to contract terms with the HMO, then followed this success by working with a second, significantly larger HMO, agreeing to provide exclusive laboratory services under a similar, capitated arrangement. The formation and work of the Consortium may provide other hospitals facing daunting competition from large commercial laboratory enterprises with a cooperative arrangement model to provide community-wide laboratory services.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Marchwinski, S S Sullivan, J B Castillo, R Johnson. The Rochester Consortium.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10172797/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Caregivers' ratings of access: do children with special health care needs fare better under fee-for-service or partially capitated managed care?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate how enrollment in a partially capitated managed care (MC) option versus the fee-for-service (FFS) system affects caregivers' ratings of dimensions of access to services among children with special health care needs (SHCN). SUBJECTS: The data were collected from telephone interviews during the summer and fall of 2002 with a random sample of 1088 caregivers of children with SHCN who qualified for Supplemental Security Income and therefore were enrolled the Medicaid program for children with SHCN in the District of Columbia. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used a 2-step procedure in which we first estimated plan choice and then constructed a selectivity correction to control for the potential selection bias linked to plan choice. We estimated the second stage equations predicting caregiver's ratings of dimensions of access as a function of the selectivity correction, the plan choice dummy variable and other exogenous variables. RESULTS: After controlling for the potential selection bias linked to plan choice and other confounding factors, we find that caregivers of children in FFS are significantly more likely than caregivers of children enrolled in the partially capitated MC plan to rate the following dimensions of access as either fair or poor: "access to specialists' care" (P < 0.01), "access to emergency room care" (P < 0.01), "convenience of the doctor's office" (P < 0.01), and "waiting time between making the appointment actual visit" (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We attribute these differences in caregivers' ratings of dimensions of access that exist between partially capitated MC and FFS enrollees to case management and care coordination services along with higher fees paid for pediatrician's and specialists' services available under MC option.

Capitation Fee↗

Coordinated care in a 'consumer-driven' health system.

High-deductible health plans--with and without spending accounts--are gaining ground. Will these evolving benefit designs complement or undermine the coordination of care for patients with chronic illnesses? Based on an October 2005 roundtable sponsored by the California HealthCare Foundation and Health Affairs, this paper discusses the implications of a changing health insurance market for the chronically ill, capitation payment for medical groups, and consumers navigating the system.

Capitation Fee↗