PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10172819

Case-based quality management system for surgery, a bottom up approach.

Abstract

Quality control has become a familiar concept in health care in The Netherlands in the last ten years, as it has elsewhere in the Western world. To achieve the goals of total quality, medical audit plays a central role in the process. An important issue for medical audit is to collect consistent and coherent data on the medical performance. As no widespread tradition exists to do this routinely using common widely accepted protocols and information technology, examples of routine quality control of medical services are scarce. In this paper a report is given of the process of collecting routine data on the surgical treatments and its complications in a Dutch general hospital. Based on the results of this and other local initiatives to control and improve the quality of surgical procedures the Dutch Association of Surgeons has recently adopted a policy document, which promotes to enhance quality Management. This paper presents also the increasing need among health care professionals to compare the results of treatment of similar patients. The role of Information Technology to achieve these goals is growing at an impressive pace. A more complete documentation of the care process will increasingly support a case based approach, which will be essential for a comprehensive analysis and Management of the care provided to patients. The paper supports a systematic collection of data documenting structure, process and outcome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B C de Vries, W J Hofdijk. 1994. Case-based quality management system for surgery, a bottom up approach.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10172819/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗