The mixed media tutorial: practical guide.

P M Procter

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10179640

The mixed media tutorial: practical guide.

P M Procter

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the use of video communications in education. This paper will describe how video communications can be used as part of a teaching and learning process linked with other communications technologies to give the student greatest advantage for effective learning to take place. The paper will conclude with a personal view of the teacher preparation required to realise appropriate use of mixed media.

Explore related subjects

Computer Communication Networks Computer-Assisted Instruction Education Humans Multimedia Telecommunications Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

P M Procter. 1998. The mixed media tutorial: practical guide.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10179640/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

E-motions: email for written emotional expression.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed2002

E-novation. Web feat.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed2002

Prodding tardy reviewers: a randomized comparison of telephone, fax, and e-mail.

CONTEXT: To compare telephone, fax, and e-mail methods of prodding tardy reviewers. METHODS: Randomized trial conducted January 1998 through June 1999 at the main editorial office of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Reviewers who had failed to file reviews by 28 days after being sent manuscripts (7 days after deadline) were sent identical messages in oral (telephone) or written (fax and e-mail) form inquiring as to the status of review, asking for its completion as soon as possible, and requesting it be sent by fax or e-mail. RESULTS: Of 378 reviewers, proportions returning reviews within 7 days were essentially identical: telephone, 85 (68%) of 125; fax, 86 (67%) of 129; and e-mail, 84 (67%) of 124 (P =.59). In the two thirds who responded, the mean time to return reviews did not differ among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Contacting tardy reviewers resulted in a review being received within 7 days in about two thirds of cases, and it made no difference if the contact was made by telephone, fax, or e-mail.

Computer Communication Networks↗