PubMed · 10180987
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
N Alazraki, J Galt. 1998. FDG imaging without PET.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10180987/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a functional imaging modality that measures the relative uptake of 18FDG with PET. The purpose of this review is to assess the potential contribution of FDG-PET scans to the treatment of head-and-neck cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were assessed from the literature with attention to what additional information may be gained from the use of FDG-PET in four clinical settings: (1) detection of occult metastatic disease in the neck, (2) detection of occult primaries in patients with neck metastases, (3) detection of synchronous primaries or metastatic disease in the chest, and (4) detection of residual/recurrent locoregional disease. RESULTS: Although the data are somewhat conflicting, FDG-PET appears to add little additional value to the physical examination and conventional imaging studies (supplemented by biopsy when appropriate) for the detection of subclinical nodal metastases, unknown primaries, or disease in the chest. However, FDG-PET scans are quite useful in differentiating residual/recurrent disease from treatment-induced normal tissue changes. A positive FDG-PET scan at 1 month after radiotherapy is highly indicative of the presence of residual disease, and a negative scan at 4 months after treatment is highly predictive of tumor eradication. CONCLUSIONS: Large-scale studies using newer generation equipment and more defined methods are needed to more rigorously assess the potential of FDG-PET in the detection of subclinical primary or simultaneous secondary tumors and of nodal or systemic spread. Currently, however, FDG-PET can contribute to the detection of residual/early recurrent tumors, leading to the timely institution of salvage therapy or the prevention of unnecessary biopsies of irradiated tissues, which may aggravate injury.
PURPOSE: To measure the impact of whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) on patient management during its first year of use in a community hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First-year FDG-PET impact was determined from 463 referring physicians' evaluations of their patients' PET imaging results using two surveys. Survey 1 was given to all physicians referring patients to PET to discover whether PET changed patient management or had decision-making value in the patient's clinical algorithm. Survey 2 was given to one surgeon and one pulmonologist after therapy to determine how PET affected the surgical, chemotherapeutic, and/or radiotherapeutic treatment for the 53 cancer patients they referred. RESULTS: The 463 responses to survey 1 described 23 different PET indications. Lung (40%), head and neck (18%), and colorectal cancers (11%) were the three leading causes of referral. PET changed patient management/therapy in 45% of all patients referred and had inferential/decision-making value in another 44%. Overall, PET had some type of positive influence in 412 (89%) of the patients. Survey 2 provided a more detailed assessment of 53 referrals from two specialists. PET positively affected surgery in 31 patients (58%), prompted the addition of chemotherapy or radiation therapy in nine patients (17%), and eliminated chemotherapy or radiation therapy in four cases (8%). Overall, PET affected patient management/therapy in 70% of the cases and had some decision-making value in another 26%, for a combined PET impact on patient management of 96%. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET can be valuable for physicians in clinical practice. Its sensitivity and specificity in metabolic imaging, when combined with complementary anatomic imaging techniques, contribute significantly to the clinical treatment of cancer patients. In addition, the high accuracy of FDG-PET makes it a cost-effective radiologic procedure in the work-up of all suspected and/or recurrent cancer patients. Further research is needed to link this demonstrated impact on patient management to cost-effectiveness.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine the tumor volume threshold for successful positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of melanoma nodal metastases. METHODS: Review of a clinical series of patients who had FDG-PET imaging of regional lymph node basins followed by lymphadenectomy. Lymph node tumor volumes were calculated from direct measurements of metastatic nodule(s) in formalin fixed specimens. PET scan interpretations were correlated with histology to determine sensitivity. Sensitivity was correlated with the aggregate lymph node tumor volume in the nodal basin and with AJCC stage group. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with 49 pathologically positive regional nodal basins comprised the study group. Median total basin tumor volume was 28.3 mm(3)(range 0.004-22,879 mm(3)). FDG-PET sensitivity for detection of all tumor volumes was 0.49. The observed 90% sensitivity threshold for detection of nodal metastases was > or = 78 mm(3). PET sensitivity was 0.14 for detection of tumor volumes < 78 mm(3). PET sensitivity differed by prescan AJCC stage: I-0.0; II-0.24; III-0.81; IV-1.0 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET reliably detects lymph node tumor deposits greater than approximately 80 mm(3) volume, but sensitivity falls rapidly below this. This amount of tumor is most likely to occur in patients with AJCC stage III or IV disease.