PubMed · 10181200
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P A Perry. 1998. Software shopping? Dump the old rules.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10181200/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The modernization of the British National Health Service, discussed by Peter Bradshaw in his paper, is having profound effects on nursing and patient care. The aim of this paper is to engage with the debate he has initiated in order to demonstrate its importance to nursing. The focus will be on key elements of the policy process not addressed by Peter Bradshaw as his emphasis was mainly on ideological concerns, but which nonetheless warrant consideration. These include the increasingly important role of evidence in policy making, and the role of nurses in the policy process. To this end four main themes are explored. First, specific comment is made on some of the points raised by Peter Bradshaw, in the context of the available evidence; secondly the role of evidence in the formulation and evaluation of policy is discussed; thirdly the policy process and nursing is examined; finally some tentative suggestions are made concerning the actions nurses and nurse managers can take to become more active in the health policy arena. The intention is to use Peter Bradshaw's work as a point of departure in examining further, some of the issues he highlights and to contribute to the debate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) responds to requests by the Department of Health for guidance on the use of selected new and established technologies in the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales. This paper asks whether the NICE methodological guidelines help NHS decision makers meet the objectives of maximum health improvements from NHS resources and an equitable availability of technologies. The analytical basis of the guidelines is a comparison of the costs and consequences of new and existing methods of dealing with particular conditions using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We explain why information on the costs and consequences of a particular technology in isolation is insufficient to address issues of efficiency of resource use. We argue that to increase efficiency, decision makers need information on opportunity costs. We show that in the absence of such information decision makers cannot identify the efficient use of resources. Finally we argue that economics provides valid methods for identifying the maximisation of health improvements for a given allocation of resources and we describe an alternative practical approach to this problem. Drawing on the experience of Ontario, Canada where an approach similar to that proposed by NICE has been in use for almost a decade, and recent reports about the consequences of NICE decisions to date, we conclude that instead of increasing the efficiency or equity of the use of NHS resources, NICE methodological guidelines may lead to: uncontrolled increases in NHS expenditures without evidence of any increase in total health improvements; increased inequities in the availability of services; and concerns about the sustainability of public funding for new technologies.