PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10185749

Great immunizations.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Epstein. 1998. Great immunizations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10185749/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of age on outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study evaluating age as a factor in treatment outcomes for chronic disabling work-related spinal disorders undergoing tertiary rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between age and objective psychosocioeconomic treatment outcomes for work-related spinal disorders undergoing functional restoration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As early as the 1950s, a link between age and low back symptoms has been identified in the literature. Several studies have demonstrated that the occurrence of low back pain is positively correlated with age up to about 50-60 years, after which prevalence declines. It has been argued that this pattern is stronger for more severe, chronic back pain cases. Little research attention has been given to age as a factor in treatment outcomes for work-related spinal disorders. METHODS: A cohort of 1052 chronically disabled (none working full-time when starting the rehabilitation program) spinal disorder (CDSD) patients were placed into five groups based on age: Group 1, <25 years (22 +/- 2 years, n = 59); Group 2, 25-34 years (30 +/- 3 years, n = 301); Group 3, 35-44 years (39 +/- 3 years, n = 381); Group 4, 45-54 (49 +/- 3 years, n = 237); and Group 5, > or =55 years (59 +/- 4 years, n = 74). All patients completed a functional restoration program combining quantitatively directed exercise progression with a multimodal disability management approach using psychological and case management techniques. Before the start of the program, and again on completion of the program, all patients received a psychosocial evaluation and were also assessed on a variety of physical motion, strength, aerobic, and functional factors, and a cumulative score was calculated, which aggregates and averages these physical measures. A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes (work return, health utilization, recurrent injury, and resolution of financial disputes) was conducted at 1 year after program completion, and at least partial information was obtained from this interview on all consecutive patients in the study. RESULTS: The length of pretreatment disability increased with age (P < 0.001), as well as pretreatment surgery rates (P < 0.002). A Mantel-Haenzel chi2 test for linear trend across age groups revealed that the percentage of patients who returned to work declined progressively from 100% in Group 1 to 69% in Group 5 (P < 0.001). The same linear trend was revealed for the percentage of patients retaining work at the end of 1 year (98-62%, P < 0.001). Older workers returned to the same job and/or the same employer (P < 0.005). Younger workers found different jobs with new employers (48-11%, P < 0.0001). Analysis of variance for the disability questionnaire revealed that after treatment subjective disability progressively increased (while improvements decreased) from Group 1 to Group 5 (P < 0.01). The cumulative physical score variable, even normalized for age, was progressively lower from Group 1 to Group 5, both at pretreatment (P < 0.03) and post-treatment (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The present study represents the first large-scale examination of the association between age and treatment outcomes for a work-related CDSD population. Age is significantly and linearly related to pretreatment duration of disability and frequency of pretreatment surgeries. After rehabilitation treatment there is a linear decrement in both work return and work retention, so that younger patients are far more likely to return and hold work after functional restoration. Older workers who go back to work are much more likely to return to the same employer and do the same job, or to become self-employed. Calculation of odds ratios revealed that patients >55 years are 5.68 times more likely to return to the same job and employer, relative to those <25 years; those >55 years were also approximately three times more likely than those <25 years to return to the same employer, compared with those <25 years. Younger workers are far more likely to take a different job and/or seek a new employer. Older patients are also somewhat more likely to seek a new health provider to deal with perceived residual pain/disability. This trend coincides with their higher post-treatment subjective disability levels, and their lower cumulative physical scores both prerehabilitation and postrehabilitation. However, age does not affect additional surgery rates, subsequent injuries, or delays in settling financial disputes.

Absenteeism↗

Effect of long term consumption of probiotic milk on infections in children attending day care centres: double blind, randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether long term consumption of a probiotic milk could reduce gastrointestinal and respiratory infections in children in day care centres. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study over seven months. SETTING: 18 day care centres in Helsinki, Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 571 healthy children aged 1-6 years: 282 (mean (SD) age 4.6 (1.5) years) in the intervention group and 289 (mean (SD) age 4.4 (1.5) years) in the control group. INTERVENTION: Milk with or without Lactobacillus GG. Average daily consumption of milk in both groups was 260 ml. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of days with respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, absences from day care because of illness, respiratory tract infections diagnosed by a doctor, and course of antibiotics. RESULTS: Children in the Lactobacillus group had fewer days of absence from day care because of illness (4.9 (95% confidence interval 4.4 to 5.5) v 5.8 (5.3 to 6.4) days, 16% difference, P=0.03; age adjusted 5.1 (4.6 to 5.6) v 5.7 (5.2 to 6.3) days, 11% difference, P=0.09). There was also a relative reduction of 17% in the number of children suffering from respiratory infections with complications and lower respiratory tract infections (unadjusted absolute % reduction -8.6 (-17.2 to -0.1), P=0.05; age adjusted odds ratio 0.75 (0.52 to 1.09), P=0.13) and a 19% relative reduction in antibiotic treatments for respiratory infection (unadjusted absolute % reduction -9.6 (-18.2 to -1.0), P=0.03; adjusted odds ratio 0.72 (0.50 to 1.03), P=0.08) in the Lactobacillus group. CONCLUSIONS: Lactobacillus GG may reduce respiratory infections and their severity among children in day care. The effects of the probiotic Lactobacillus GG were modest but consistently in the same direction.

Absenteeism↗

Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care.

Interventions that encourage return to normal function and reduce fear of physical activity have been shown to improve outcomes for patients with back pain, but routine medical care for back pain often does not provide such interventions. This paper proposes a stepped-care approach that addresses the functional outcomes of back pain. Step 1, which is relevant to most patients, addresses the common fears of patients with back pain and encourages patients to resume normal activities. Step 2, which targets the substantial minority of patients who require more than simple advice to resume activities, provides brief, structured interventions that support physical exercise and return to normal activities. Step 3 targets patients who require more intensive interventions, including treatment of psychological illness when present, before they can return to normal activities in work and family life. Patient needs relevant to these three levels of care are delineated. This stepped-care approach provides a framework for sequencing progressively more intensive interventions and coordinating the efforts of primary care physicians, allied health professionals, behavioral health clinicians, and patients to improve functional outcomes in patients with back pain.

Absenteeism↗