PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10186898

Research synthesis. Coding and conjectures.

Abstract

In meta-analyses the extraction and coding of information from primary research reports has to be completed in a competent way because these tasks implicate most of the decisions that determine the usefulness of the final product. The authors offer guidelines that make it more likely that high-quality information is reliably extracted and coded from primary research reports. These guidelines address issues ranging from the selection of items and construction of coding materials to sustaining reliability and vigilance across extended periods of coding. Thereafter, the authors note how the methodology of meta-analysis results in pressure to change the type of information that appears in primary research reports, and close by offering a few conjectures about the future of meta-analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W A Stock, J Goméz Benito, N Balluerka Lasa. 1996. Research synthesis. Coding and conjectures.. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327879601900108

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tumor size on computed tomography scans: is one measurement enough?

BACKGROUND: Bidimensional tumor measurements are used routinely as surrogates for tumor volume. The purpose this study was to determine whether there is any added benefit in bidimensional or tridimensional measurements over a unidimensional measurement. METHODS: Sixty-nine colorectal hepatic metastases on 19 computed tomography scans (1-8 lesions per scan) from 9 patients were analyzed. Five patients contributed 2-4 scans each (mean, 3 scans). The standard volume of these lesions was determined by the "summation of areas" technique. The maximum axial dimension, the product of the greatest axial dimensions, and several volume estimates (based on the volumes of a sphere, an ellipsoid, and a cube) each were correlated with the standard volume. RESULTS: The maximum axial dimension and the product of the greatest axial dimensions correlated equally with tumor volume (correlation coefficient = 0.93). Surrogate measures based on the equations for a sphere and an ellipsoid underestimated tumor volume, whereas the equation for a cube overestimated volume. CONCLUSIONS: When reporting tumor size, there is no significant added benefit in reporting bidimensional or tridimensional measurements over the maximum axial dimension.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

[Roaming through methodology. XXX. The capture-recapture method].

The capture-recapture method is useful for the estimation of the incidence and prevalence of a disease if there exist multiple lists that can be linked. Some assumptions have to be fulfilled for the estimate to be adequate. For example, for every list every individual should have the same probability to be on the list, and the lists should be independent. In case of two lists one has to assume that these are independent in order to get an estimate. When three or more lists are available this strong assumption may be mitigated.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗