PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10202201

Motor function in irritable bowel syndrome.

Abstract

The evidence supporting a role of abnormal motor function in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is reviewed. Symptoms commonly present in IBS patients, such as vomiting, diarrhea, constipation or incomplete rectal evacuation, indicate that a motor disorder is implicit as either a primary or secondary disturbance. Physiological studies implicate a disturbance of transit through the small bowel and proximal colon, and abnormal motor responses of the rectum to distention in IBS patients. Intestinal contractions (physiological or 'abnormal') are associated with the sensation of pain, suggesting that these contractions are interactions between abnormal motor and sensory functions in IBS. Therapies aimed at correcting abnormal transit or antispasmodics are the main pharmacological approaches to the relief of IBS, and, although the latter are not always effective in the long term response to treatment, they support the role of dysmotility in IBS. Most novel therapies under trial probably modulate both sensory and motor functions, and are discussed briefly. In summary, the weight of clinical, physiological and pharmacological evidence supports a role of abnormal motility in IBS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Camilleri. 1999. Motor function in irritable bowel syndrome.. https://doi.org/10.1155/1999%2F240329

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Anticholinergic drugs in patients with bladder outlet obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To review the available evidence concerning the use of anticholinergic drugs, alone or in combination with alpha-blockers, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and concomitant overactive bladder syndrome, to assess whether the currently available evidence suggests a role for antimuscarinic drugs in patients with BPH. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science through a complex search strategy including "free text" and "MeSH" protocols. Moreover, the Cochrane database of systematic review was browsed for records regarding BPH and the abstract books of the American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, and International Continence Society annual meetings from 2000 to 2005 were hand-searched for studies concerning the topic of the review. RESULTS: From the literature search, we identified four randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two prospective case series, and a few congress abstracts. For methodologic issues, the best RCT was based on urodynamic data, but did not provide any clinical insight on the patients' symptoms. The other papers were affected by significant methodologic or clinical drawbacks. CONCLUSION: The available data may be considered promising in terms of safety and efficacy. The evidence of the limited number of RCTs available, considering their methodologic or clinical shortcomings, is not sufficient to support the clinical use of combination therapy with alpha-blockers and anticholinergic drugs in patients with associated storage and voiding symptoms. Well-designed, large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long-term RCTs are needed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic drugs, alone or in combination with alpha-blockers, in this category of patients.

Cholinergic Antagonists↗