PubMed · 10202427
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J S Gage. Creating a computerized anesthesia record.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10202427/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The specialty of anesthesiology is at a crossroad. Do anesthesiologists stay in the illusionary safe harbor of the operating room and allow critical care anesthesiologists to float alone? How can in-fighting with other medical and nonmedical providers be avoided, while maintaining or expanding the historic and hopefully future roles of anesthesiologists as hospital-based physicians? A different tact is required to redefine the scope of the practice with broadened training to provide increased expertise in the evolving medical marketplace. This approach would include solid training in business, informatics, data management, and critical thinking on outcomes. This paradigm shift may be challenging, and requires redirection, reallocation of assets, re-education, and a new mindset. If successfully applied, however, it presents a means to strengthen the respected position of the specialty and to promote the medical care and practice of perioperative specialists in the rapidly changing landscape of modern medicine. Regarding the question of turf and ownership of the ICU, the authors suggest pursuing the higher ground of an excellent scope of practice, which facilitates the care and activities of surgical and primary care colleagues. These colleagues, administrators, and governmental agencies will have to be re-educated to support training and provide equitable remuneration. Appropriately trained anesthesiologist-intensivists can complement many other care providers, while providing a wide range of services with an economy of care, whether in a semiclosed or closed ICU setting.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the availability of specialized equipment for the difficult airway management in obstetric units of German departments of anesthesiology. DESIGN AND SETTING: An anonymous questionnaire survey was mailed to the directors of 993 German departments of anesthesiology. Completed replies were grouped by number of deliveries performed each year. MAIN RESULTS: 55.5% of the hospitals responded. Data of 449 answers were evaluated for this investigation. A difficult airway cart was available in 99.3% of the departments. More detailed investigation revealed that different shaped laryngoscope blades (74.9% of the departments), laryngeal masks (91.0%), a fiberoptic bronchoscope (85.9%), and transtracheal puncture devices (59.9%) were available in the majority of the units. However, only a minority of the departments had these devices directly available in their obstetric operating rooms (OR; laryngeal masks 36.2%, fiberoptic bronchoscope 23.9%, transtracheal puncture set 22.0%). Larger units with more than 1,000 deliveries per year provided their equipment more often directly in the obstetric OR or the facility housing the obstetric unit than did smaller units with less than 1,000 deliveries per year (p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survey of German departments of anesthesia revealed that specialized equipment for the difficult airway management often is not directly available in the obstetric OR. Anesthesiologists must familiarize themselves as to which difficult airway equipment is available in their unit and where it is stored.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.