PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10207256

Diuretics in renal failure.

Abstract

Fluid retention following reduction in the glomerular filtration rate causes extracellular fluid volume expansion that reduces tubular reabsorption by residual nephrons, thereby maintaining the external sodium balance. The price paid for this is salt-dependent hypertension. Thus, loop diuretics are the best treatment for uremic hypertension. Diuretics are also used in chronic renal failure to treat edema due to nephrotic syndrome and congestive heart failure (CHF). In nephrotics, edema is often refractory to diuretics because of low plasma protein, depletion of the intravascular compartment, decrease in the protein-bound fraction of the diuretic in peritubular blood, and increase in tubular fluid. Thus, higher doses are needed. In uremics with CHF the efficacy of diuretics may be hampered because of the reduced renal blood flow. The association of dopamine (1-1.5 microg/kg body weight/min) may overcome this resistance; improvement in cardiac function by dialysis ultrafiltration may also help. Diuretic resistance is sometimes observed; it may be overcome by the following procedures: in CHF by the use of digitalis and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; by substitution of an ineffective loop diuretic for another one; by using larger doses of diuretic; by intravenous infusion rather than bolus therapy, and by a combination of diuretics acting in different segments of the tubule: loop diuretic+thiazide+amiloride. Intravenous infusion of 20% albumin has also been suggested.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Andreucci, D Russo, G Fuiano, R Minutolo, V E Andreucci. Diuretics in renal failure.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000057416

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗