PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10207593

[Surgery for lung volume reduction].

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define the place of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for non-bullous emphysema, to discuss the mechanisms of postoperative functional improvement and to suggest guidelines for perioperative medical management. DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: The Medline data base was searched for any article (original papers, editorials, comments, reviews) published in English, French or German, from 1980 to April 1998. The key words were: lung volume reduction surgery, emphysema, respiratory failure, anaesthesia, lung transplantation. The data have been analysed to explain the physiological mechanisms underlying the postoperative improvements and to assess the risk-benefit ratio associated with LVRS. Finally, proposals are suggested for selection criteria and perioperative medical strategies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Besides pharmacological treatment and lung transplantation, LVRS is considered as an alternative treatment for patients with end-stage pulmonary emphysema. Perioperative management includes selective lung ventilation, continuous peridural analgesia and a general anaesthetic technique that can be easily reversed. Care should be taken to detect and rapidly correct dynamic hyperinflation, pneumothorax, tube malpositioning and major air leaks. In a majority of selected patients (70-80%), resection of 20-30% of lung volume produces significant clinical and physiological improvement (dyspnoea, exercise capacity, FEV1, VO2max), as well as of the quality of life that has been attributed to greater elastic recoil, reduced respiratory workload and better diaphragmatic and right ventricular function. The most common complication is prolonged air leaks. In-hospital mortality varies widely (0-20%, with a median value at 4%), depending in part on the experience of the surgical team and on the selection criteria. Several factors may predict an unfavourable outcome: advanced age, hypercapnia, diffuse emphysema, predominant airway disease and previous thoracic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: According to the favourable preliminary results and an acceptable incidence of perioperative complications, LVRS is presently considered as a new therapeutic option for some patients with respiratory failure. Future clinical studies should be focused on appropriate selection criteria, operative techniques and long term outcome data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Licker, A Spiliopoulos, M Gressier, F Clergue. 1999. [Surgery for lung volume reduction].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0750-7658(99)80071-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Scrotal extension of emphysematous pyelonephritis.

We report an extensive form of emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) in the right kidney extending from the anterior abdominal wall to the scrotum in a patient with renal calculi with obstructive uropathy and describe the progression route of infection from retroperitoneum to scrotum. Such an extensive occurrence of EPN is very rare. The patient succumbed after 48 h despite aggressive treatment.

Emphysema↗

Lung volume reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been re-introduced for treating patients with severe diffuse emphysema. It is a procedure that aims to improve long-term daily functioning, although it is costly and may also be associated with a high risk of mortality. OBJECTIVES: To assemble evidence from randomised controlled trials for the effectiveness of LVRS, and identify optimal surgical techniques. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) register. Searches are current to September 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that studied the safety and efficacy of LVRS in patients with diffuse emphysema were included. Studies were excluded if they investigated giant or bullous emphysema. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data. Where possible, data from more than one study were combined using RevMan 4.2 software. MAIN RESULTS: Eight studies (1663 participants) met the entry criteria of the review. One study accounted for 73% of the participants recruited. Study quality was high, although blinding in studies was not possible. Ninety day mortality was significantly greater in all those who underwent LVRS (odds ratio 6.57 (95% CI 3.34 to 12.95), four studies, N = 1415). A subgroup analysis by risk status suggested that there was a subgroup of participants who were consistently at a significant risk of death, although this was only measured in one large study. The ninety day mortality data indicated that death was more likely with LVRS irrespective of risk status identified in one large study. Improvements in lung function, quality of life and exercise capacity were more likely with LVRS than with usual follow-up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence summarised in this review is drawn from one large study, and several smaller trials. The findings from the large study indicated that in patients who survive up to three months post-surgery, there were significantly better health status and lung function outcomes in favour of surgery compared with usual medical care. Patients identified post hoc as being of high risk of death from surgery were those with particularly impaired lung function and poor diffusing capacity and/or homogenous emphysema. Further research should address the effect of this intervention on exacerbations and rate of decline in lung function and health status.

Emphysema↗

Perioperative complications of lung transplantation in patients with emphysema and fibrosis: experience from 1992-2002.

UNLABELLED: Our objective was to describe the incidence of perioperative complications of lung transplantation among patients with emphysema and fibrosis and the morbidity and mortality risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 111 lung transplant patients engrafted from 1992 to 2002 for emphysema (n = 65) or lung fibrosis (n = 46). This descriptive study included the most frequent complications during the perioperative period in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: The most frequent intraoperative complications were reperfusion syndrome, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrhythmias. Among patients with emphysema, the follow-up of postoperative complications proved statistically significant on univariate analysis for an association of patient mortality with prolonged intubation (P = .005), rejection (P = .0001), hemorrhage (P = .0001), sepsis (P = .0001), renal failure (P = .001), and implantation response (P = .014). Mortality among these patients was 16.9%. Mechanical ventilation for over 48 hours and postoperative hemorrhage were the variables with the greatest predictive value for mortality in the postoperative period. Among patients with fibrosis, the complication-related mortality were reperfusion syndrome (P = .039), implantation response (P = .039), renal failure (P = .013), rejection (P = .016), and sepsis (P < .001). The mortality rate was 23.9% with sepsis (P = .000) being the most frequent cause of death in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent intraoperative complications were reperfusion syndrome and hemodynamic instability. The most frequent postoperative complications were implantation response, sepsis, prolonged intubation, hemorrhage, and renal failure.

Emphysema↗