PubMed · 10210634
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F C Brunicardi. 1999-05-01. Presidential Address. Academic program development.. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1999.5585
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Effective July 1997, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) established a research pathway to certification to encourage research training of general internists and subspecialists. OBJECTIVE: To document the current status of research training in six selected subspecialty programs, to examine opportunities available for trainees to undertake formal course work, and to report the percentage of subspecialty programs that might accept research pathway fellows. DESIGN: National Study of Graduate Education in Internal Medicine questionnaires from 1996-1997 and 1997-1998. SETTING: Programs in internal medicine subspecialties accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. PARTICIPANTS: 1163 (84%) and 1094 (79%) directors of internal medicine subspecialty programs in 1996-1997 and 1997-1998, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions on the amount of time fellows usually spend conducting research and available opportunities to pursue course work leading to an advanced degree. RESULTS: On average, during their last year of training, fellows enrolled in infectious disease, nephrology, endocrinology, and rheumatology programs spent 40% to 50% of their time conducting research, whereas fellows in gastroenterology and cardiology spent 25% to 30% of their time conducting research. Compared with programs sponsored by major teaching hospitals, a greater percentage of programs sponsored by academic medical center hospitals planned to accept persons interested in pursuing the new ABIM Research Pathway (28% vs. 8%) and to provide opportunities for fellows to obtain an advanced degree (60% vs. 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Few internal medicine subspecialty programs are currently designed to provide adequate research training as defined by the Institute of Medicine and the ABIM.
An economic evaluation of drug acquisition, nursing care, pharmacy time, laboratory costs, supplies, and ancillary care was conducted as a first step toward developing a pneumonia management plan at the University of Kentucky Medical Center (UKMC). UKMC costs were compared with costs at other hospitals treating pneumonia patients on Medicare. Overall costs for pneumonia at the 25% of hospitals nationwide with the lowest costs for Medicare patients with this condition were determined and compared with costs at UKMC. Against nationwide benchmarks, efficiencies at UKMC for treating simple pneumonia ranged from 45% for pharmacy expenses to 81% for nursing costs. Efficiencies for complicated pneumonia ranged from 47% for laboratory costs to 67% for nursing costs. The most cost-efficient antimicrobial treatment options were promoted and integrated into a pneumonia management plan based on Infectious Diseases Society of America treatment guidelines. A comparison of pneumonia treatment costs at UKMC with those at the 25% of hospitals nationwide with the lowest treatment costs for Medicare patients with pneumonia revealed that UKMC pharmacy costs could be optimized. Strategies for standardizing the care of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are being implemented.