PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10213021

Does skepticism towards medical care predict mortality?

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Attitudes towards medical care have a strong effect on utilization and outcomes. However, there has been little attention to the impact on outcomes of doubts about the value of medical care. This study examines the impact of skepticism toward medical care on mortality using data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey (NMES). METHODS: A nationally representative sample from the United States comprising 18,240 persons (> or = 25 years) were surveyed. Skepticism was measured through an 8-item scale. Mortality at 5-year follow-up was ascertained through the National Death Index. RESULTS: In a proportional hazards survival analysis of 5-year mortality that controlled for age, sex, race, education, income, marital status, morbidity, and health status, skepticism toward medical care independently predicted subsequent mortality. That risk was attenuated after adjustment for health behaviors but not after adjustment for health insurance status. CONCLUSION: Medical skepticism may be a risk factor for early death. That effect may be mediated through higher rates of unhealthy behavior among the medically skeptical. Further studies using more reliable measures are needed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Fiscella, P Franks, C M Clancy, M P Doescher, J S Banthin. 1999. Does skepticism towards medical care predict mortality?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199904000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗