PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10214806

SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant.

Abstract

This study examined the speech perception performance of 71 postlingually deafened adults implanted with the CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant. After 3 months of implant use, one third of the patients (n = 23) preferred to use the Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS) strategy, and two thirds of them (n = 48) chose to use the Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS) strategy. The mean CID sentence scores were similar for the SAS and CIS user groups at the 3-month postoperative interval. In contrast, the mean CNC word score of the SAS users was significantly higher than the mean score of the CIS users after 3 months of implant experience. Patients who preferred to use SAS demonstrated significantly shorter duration of deafness at time of implantation than did the CIS users, whereas the CIS users demonstrated significantly higher preoperative sentence recognition scores than the SAS users. The results suggested that access to a preferred processing strategy improved the overall group performance of postlingually deafened adults in the present study compared to the results of previous studies in which only the CIS strategy was available to most patients with the Clarion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Osberger, L Fisher. 1999. SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant.. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894991080s415

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A compensation election for binary social choice.

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.

Choice Behavior↗

The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.

Long waiting times for inpatient treatment in the UK National Health Service have been a source of popular and political concern, and therefore a target for policy initiatives. In the London Patient Choice Project, patients at risk of breaching inpatient waiting time targets were offered the choice of an alternative hospital with a guaranteed shorter wait. This paper develops a simple theoretical model of the effect of greater patient choice on waiting times. It then uses a difference in difference econometric methodology to estimate the impact of the London choice project on ophthalmology waiting times. In line with the model predictions, the project led to shorter average waiting times in the London region and a convergence in waiting times amongst London hospitals.

Choice Behavior↗