PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10231831

Indicator quality for multidisciplinary systems.

J Riley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In January 1998, a project studying the Unification of Indicator Quality for Assessment of Impact of Multidisciplinary Systems (UNIQUAIMS) began at IACR-Rothamsted. This three year European Union-funded project will examine the choice of indicators for the assessment of the sustainability and impact of multidisciplinary systems. The project links 27 developing country and European partners to clarify methods and rationalize indicators for assessing impact and sustainability in three priority areas: farming systems, ecosystems converted to agricultural use and degraded ecosystems. The results will be disseminated to national and regional agricultural research institutes, extension agents, research planners and policymakers to promote improved interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and cross-sectorial management of natural resources. A strong socioeconomic component is involved. This paper describes the scientific and policy issues which led to the project and focuses upon the need to: clarify current methods of impact and sustainability assessment; identify key qualitative and quantitative indicators for both baseline and on-going studies and their relevance at different scales, allowing for the balance between standardization and responsiveness to local conditions; and establish sound guidelines for indicator collection procedures at all stages of research, from project conception through to impact and sustainability assessment.

Explore related subjects

Data Interpretation, StatisticalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Riley. 1999. Indicator quality for multidisciplinary systems.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515600.ch10

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Comparisons of two-part models with competitors.

Two-part models arise when there is a clump of 0 observations in a distribution of continuous non-negative responses. Several methods for comparing two such distributions are available. These include the straightforward application of the z-test (or t-test), the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank sum test, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and three tests that use a 2 degree of freedom chi(2) test based on the sum of the test for equality of proportions and a conditional chi(2) test for the continuous responses. This conditional test may be the z-test, the rank sum test, or the chi(2) corresponding to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. This study compares the size and power of several of these methods. All tests have the appropriate distribution under the null hypothesis if the distribution of the continuous part has finite moments. If it does not, the z-test has no power to detect any alternatives. It is found that the 2 d.f. tests are superior to the others when the larger proportion of 0 values corresponds to the population with the larger mean. If the reverse holds, the difference in the proportion of zeros reinforces the difference in means and some single-part models (the rank sum or Kolmogorov-Smirnov) do best. In those cases, the two-part models are not far behind, although statistically significantly poorer with respect to power. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
PubMed2001

Power and sample size requirements for two-part models.

Two-part models assume the data has a probability mass at zero and a continuous response for values greater than 0. We construct tests based on the proportion of zeros and the difference among the positive values of a response giving rise to a two degree of freedom chi(2) test. This note gives the non-centrality parameter and finds the power for the test. The power is compared to the simulation results in a recent paper. We derive sample size calculations. We note that some modifications of this procedure may provide better tests if the non-zero responses are discrete. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗