PubMed · 10237374
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F B Vogt. Open memorandum: standards.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10237374/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A review of the literature on advanced airway management indicates that the intubating laryngeal-mask airway (ILMA) may be an ideal device for airway control in the rural trauma patient. The ILMA is an advanced laryngeal-mask airway designed to allow oxygenation of the unconscious patient as well as blind tracheal intubation with an endotracheal tube. The ILMA is an easy-to-use airway with a high success rate of insertion, and requires little training. For the rural physician managing a difficult airway in a trauma patient, the ILMA has been found to be reliable and successful when other techniques fail, such as fiberoptic intubation and direct laryngoscopy. The ILMA has also been reported to cause less hemodynamic change and less injury to the teeth and lips than direct laryngoscopy. Further, the ILMA was found to be easier and faster to use with a higher success rate than either the combitube or endotracheal tube for unskilled healthcare providers. Limitations and complications of the ILMA may include aspiration, esophageal intubation, damage to the larynx or other tissues during blind passage of a tracheal tube, and edema of the epiglottis.
The risk of litigation in the emergency room is not directly proportional to the severity of injury. In fact, the risk of initiation of legal action is greater in cases of relatively modest permanent and partial disability. In these cases, failure to obtain and document informed consent, failure to effectively communicate with the patient and family, and failure to assure followup and prompt assessment of complications are the factors that have most frequently led to litigation. Orthopaedic surgery ranks fifth among medical specialties in the total number of claims filed and also fifth in the cumulative amount of financial payments. Approximately 30% of filed cases ultimately result in some form of financial payment. The driving force behind litigation is financial gain for plaintiff's attorneys and compensation for plaintiffs. The motive is not the improvement of medical delivery systems or individual behavior. Access to useful data of a legal nature is extremely difficult. Only a small number of cases go on to a jury-based decision of public record. It is difficult to get accurate and complete information on the total number of cases filed, cases withdrawn, terms of settlements, and arbitrations because of the confidential nature of the settlement process.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.