PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10239398

Progress toward a second generation Laboratory Information System (LIS).

R R Grams
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A Laboratory Information System (LIS) is a convenient organization of programs and hardware designed to meet the health care delivery needs of a department of pathology. A full service LIS is now a commercially viable product and after 2 years of experience, certain desirable design features are evident for a second generation system. Such variables as hardware configuration, physical plant, libraries, diagnostic algorithms, system usage and surveillance, and manpower and human engineering are now significant operational features and essential for LIS acceptance by a department of pathology as well as the practicing medical staff.

Explore related subjects

Data DisplayFloridaHospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499Hospital Communication SystemsHospitals, TeachingInformation SystemsLaboratoriesNursing Service, HospitalOnline SystemsSystems AnalysisJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R R Grams. 1977. Progress toward a second generation Laboratory Information System (LIS).. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02222588

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Preparing medical students for a filmless environment: instruction on the preparation of electronic case presentations from PACS.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: As the use of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) expands and radiology departments become increasingly filmless, it will become increasingly necessary to teach physicians how to use PACS and download diagnostic images. The authors developed an instruction method in which medical students enrolled in a radiology clerkship were taught how to use the PACS, download digital images, and incorporate them into an electronic case presentation. The feasibility and potential benefits of this instructional method were studied prospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June and October 1999, all 36 medical students enrolled in Harvard Medical School's core radiology clerkship at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, were required to give an electronic radiology case presentation with images downloaded from the departmental PACS. They were taught how to download images, edit them, and then import them into PowerPoint software. They were also given access to the hospital information system to obtain pertinent clinical information. At the formal presentations, the images were displayed with a liquid crystal display (LCD) projector. The students were surveyed on the Ist and last days of the clerkship regarding their learning experiences. RESULTS: Before the radiology clerkship, 81% of the students had never given an electronic presentation with computer and LCD projector, 83% had no PACS experience, and 56% had no PowerPoint experience. All students learned to prepare and deliver electronic presentations of radiologic cases downloaded from PACS. Their presentations were informative, innovative, and entertaining, and the images were well displayed. The students praised the instruction highly and thought their new skills would serve them well. CONCLUSION: Teaching medical students how to prepare and deliver electronic presentations of radiologic cases downloaded from PACS proved to be very feasible and well appreciated by the students.

Data Display↗
PubMed2001

Achieving graphical excellence: suggestions and methods for creating high-quality visual displays of experimental data.

Graphics are an important means of communicating experimental data and results. There is evidence, however, that many of the graphics printed in scientific journals contain errors, redundancies, and lack clarity. Perhaps more important, many graphics fail to portray data at an appropriate level of detail, presenting summary statistics rather than underlying distributions. We seek to aid investigators in the production of high-quality graphics that do their investigations justice by providing the reader with optimum access to the relevant aspects of the data. The depiction of by-subject data, the signification of pairing when present, and the use of symbolic dimensionality (graphing different symbols to identify relevant subgroups) and small multiples (the presentation of an array of similar graphics each depicting one group of subjects) to portray stratification are stressed. Step-by-step instructions for the construction of high-quality graphics are offered. We hope that authors will incorporate these suggestions when developing graphics to accompany their manuscripts and that this process will lead to improvements in the graphical literacy of scientific journals. We also hope that journal editors will keep these principles in mind when refereeing manuscripts submitted for peer review.

Data Display↗