PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10248800

Some methodological issues concerning comparative hospital-organization studies.

Abstract

There are methodological issues associated with using hospital ownership and size as determinants of the structure and behaviors of hospitals. Theoretical and empirical inconsistencies reported in the literature prompted me to examine the relationships between ownership and size for a large sample of general hospitals (i.e., hospitals in one domain). The results of my investigation point to the advisability of including hospitals with religious affiliations in studies of this type. Some of the methodological issues pertinent to hospital-organization studies are relevant to other organization research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C L Graeff. 1980. Some methodological issues concerning comparative hospital-organization studies.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10248800/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures.

BACKGROUND: Oncological procedures may have better outcomes if performed by high-volume providers. METHODS: A review of the English language literature incorporating searches of the Medline, Embase and Cochrane collaboration databases was performed. Studies were included if they involved a patient cohort from 1984 onwards, were community or population based, and assessed health outcome as a dependent variable and volume as an independent variable. The studies were also scored quantifiably to assess generalizability with respect to any observed volume-outcome relationship and analysed according to organ system; numbers needed to treat were estimated where possible. RESULTS: Sixty-eight relevant studies were identified and a total of 41 were included, of which 13 were based on clinical data. All showed either an inverse relationship, of variable magnitude, between provider volume and mortality, or no volume-outcome effect. All but two clinical reports revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between volume and outcome; none demonstrated the opposite. CONCLUSION: High-volume providers have a significantly better outcome for complex cancer surgery, specifically for pancreatectomy, oesphagectomy, gastrectomy and rectal resection.

Health Facility Size↗