PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10256905

Building a structured learning package.

Abstract

Pharmacists must become educators of patients and of pharmacy technical personnel. The literature cited in this paper has found that problems of patient compliance, personnel management, the high cost of medical care, and patient medical self-help may very well be solved in part through the application of competently written learning packages. One specific approach to learning package creation is illustrated in this paper, using the training of a unit-dose technician as an example. The subjects of student motivation, step-wise learning using subobjectives, learning feedback, material relevance, and student evaluation are discussed. Higher-level cognitive skills and readability are briefly discussed and illustrated to focus the readers' attention on the more difficult aspects of building learning packages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Ferencz. 1982. Building a structured learning package.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10256905/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information: a method to change clinical practice among physicians?

OBJECTIVES: Problem-oriented drug information is characterised by health professionals actively seeking drug information through various sources. In this study our objective was to determine the quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information among physicians. METHODS: Evaluation forms accompanying 163 written answers to physicians from a drug information centre were used to examine the quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information during the period December 1996 to June 1998. Physicians were asked whether the preliminary telephone answer was useful and, furthermore, whether the written answer was fast enough, relevant, adequately comprehensive and had valuable references. Physicians were also asked whether the answer had caused any change in their clinical practice. If yes, they were then asked to describe the actual changes. RESULTS: Of 163 evaluation forms, 117 (72%) were returned by physicians. Eighty-six physicians received a preliminary telephone answer and 83 (97%) stated that this was useful. Among the physicians, 92 (79%) found that the answer was fast enough, relevant, adequately comprehensive and with valuable references, while 19 (16%) found that the answer satisfied three of these four quality criteria. Seventy-one evaluation forms stated that the answer had caused a change in clinical practice. Sixty-eight (96%) of these contained a description of the change. Thirty-five evaluation forms that stated that the answers did not cause any change in clinical practice showed the same quality score as for the total group. Thus, 28 (80%) of these satisfied four and 5 (14%) satisfied three of the quality criteria. Improved routines for and control of ongoing pharmacotherapy was the most common change in clinical practice reported by physicians. CONCLUSION: The results show that, in general, physicians found problem-oriented drug information to be of high quality, and that it had an impact on their clinical practice. Problem-oriented drug information could be a method to change clinical practice among physicians.

Drug Information Services↗