PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10267747

Evaluation protocol for information system planning.

Abstract

Although some believe that electronic management information systems in the health care setting are of questionable value, I cannot support that position. There are undoubtedly health care institutions with management information systems (MISs) that are of dubious value, just as there are institutions in which the MIS is of enormous value. The question of the value of an MIS to an institution has more to do with an understanding of what an MIS is, what the institution's information needs are, and what the MIS can and should be doing for an organization, than it does with any inherent benefits that the system displays in and of itself exclusive of its environment. The views that follow address the process of evaluation that should take place to assess these issues and maximize the effectiveness of an information system in an organization. Figure 1 is a graphic representation of the evaluation process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H H Schmitz. 1984. Evaluation protocol for information system planning.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10267747/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Forming of opinion in medical decision making and primary hyperparathyroidism].

A recent symposium regarding primary hyperparathyroidism, pHPT, dealt with the issue of surgical treatment versus conservative monitoring. Studies from the past decade showed an increase in mortality for patients with both mild and symptomatic pHPT. There is a direct relationship between risk of death and severity of pHPT, and surgery favorably affects mortality. Patients with untreated mild pHPT show a slow increase in mortality over time. Cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric morbidity were also shown to be ameliorated after surgery. Generally, patients with pHPT benefit from surgery. Some disagreed in spite of substantial data, and advocated a less aggressive approach, yet management must be based on strictly medical reasoning and well-performed studies. Economics may influence what we might accomplish, but must not influence the decision as to what the medical objective should be.

Decision Making↗