PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10268653

A career imperative.

Abstract

The hospital industry has experienced major change in its organizational, delivery, financial, and social schema. As a result, the role of the healthcare executive has also changed. The new professional administrator requirements have called for the lengthening of academic programs to meet the evolving challenges of the industry. The lack of a formal means of entry into the profession has left many confused because of the various professional development models available. Without proper advice, these do not hold significant distinction for the recent graduate. Academic programs have been lengthened from one to two years of academic coursework while the traditionally required residency has been virtually eliminated. Increased demands on both practitioners and professors of academic programs have caused a schism between theory and practice, adversely affecting the student preparing for the profession. The problem is compounded by the various professional development models available and the several opinions as to which is "best". The confusion for students, faculty, and practitioners which has resulted must be minimized through recognition of the problem, clarification of terminology, bridging the gap between academic and practice, and a rekindling of the mentor/protege relationship.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J W Dalston, T A Denton. A career imperative.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10268653/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing CQI projects in hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement approaches such as continuous quality improvement (CQI) and total quality management are widely used, but little is known about how much it costs to use the principles and techniques required to implement CQI processes. In the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Improving the Quality of Hospital Care (IQHC) program, four consortia of hospitals were funded in the early 1990s. Interviews with quality managers at 38 of the consortia hospitals were conducted in 1995 to determine the costs of conducting CQI projects to allow an estimation of the marginal cost of using CQI processes (particularly cross-disciplinary teams) to improve quality of care. CQI PROJECTS: Quality managers described 69% of project outcomes as critical to clinical services. Team members identified the issues their teams addressed and selected the project 64% of the time, the methods of analysis 87% of the time, and the approaches to resolving the problem or issue 97% of the time. Most of the respondents agreed that the team members had the authority to resolve the problem without appealing to higher levels of management. Costs for hospitals' most recently completed projects varied widely, from $148 for the entire project to $18,590. The length or duration of the projects also varied widely, from 1 month to 66 months. DISCUSSION: In the hospitals included in this sample, all of which were highly self-selected (evidenced by their participation in a voluntary consortium of hospitals focused on quality of care), knowledge of CQI processes appeared to be fairly thorough. Teams appeared to have a reasonable amount of autonomy. New CQI projects should be subjected to scrutiny in terms of their likely contribution to quality of care, as distinct from other positive outcomes.

Hospital Administration↗