PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10269477

A physician profile system.

R L Braham·H S Ruchlin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The need for effective management information systems is now evident. No longer is pertinent and timely information merely something desirable to group practice; it is essential for management control and even survival in today's healthcare environment. Most of the management information systems currently in use are designed for controlling line-item budget categories and not the key professionals whose actions determine the fate of the practice. A physician practice profile system was developed at the Cornell Medical Practice and implemented in July 1982. This tiered reporting system is described in detail, including its ancillary service utilization and quality audit profiles, and the results of the system are presented.

Explore related subjects

Group PracticeInformation SystemsManagement AuditManagement Information SystemsNew York CityJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R L Braham, H S Ruchlin. A physician profile system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10269477/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Managing risk: risk perception, trust and control in a Primary Care Partnership.

In this article, managers' perceptions of risk on entering a newly formed primary health care partnership are explored, as are the mechanisms of trust and control used to manage them. The article reports a qualitative component of a 2-year National Health and Medical Research Council funded study of trust within the structures of a Primary Care Partnership (PCP) in Victoria, Australia. Multiple methods of data collection were employed. We found that managers identified risks at system, partnership and agency levels, and that as trust was built, concern about risks diminished. Trust effectively facilitated joint action, but it was betrayed on occasions, in which case the informal power of group process was used to contain the problems. The implications of this study for policy makers are in terms of understanding how perceptions of risk are constructed, the ways managers use social control to create a safer context in which to locate the trust-based relationships that facilitate joint action, and the importance of institutional arrangements. Without trust, joint action is hard to achieve, and without control, it is difficult to prevent breaches of trust from inhibiting joint action.

Group Practice↗