PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10271521

Community medicine in Cuba.

Abstract

The 25 years of revolution in Cuba have brought about great changes in the health care system. The health status of the population has been transformed from that of a developing country to one approximating the developed countries. The delivery of primary care at the community level has evolved over the past 15 years as a result of critical evaluations of the new implementations. The community polyclinic has been the basis for all health planning since 1975. This model has the health of the community as its main concern and the mechanism for involving the community in healthcare decisions has been established. The history of the community polyclinic and the evolution of the guidelines by which it functions are reviewed. In practice, many problems persist and the strategy for resolution of current conflicts will provide for interesting developments in the near future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E J Pérez-Stable. 1985. Community medicine in Cuba.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198504)13%3A2%3C124%3A%3Aaid-jcop2290130205%3E3.0.co%3B2-b

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The impact of micro health insurance on Rwandan health centre costs.

While the implications of payment mechanisms for provider behaviour and cost have been amply explored in industrialized countries, there is little empirical evidence from developing countries. This study exploits the opportunities created by a pilot study of micro health insurance with capitation in Rwanda to address this issue. Using cross-sectional data collected in 52 health centres, the paper employs an econometric cost function with payer-specific outputs to assess the cost impact of two provider payment mechanisms: (1) user fees for care paid by the uninsured, and (2) capitation payment paid by informal insurance schemes for the insured. The cost function allows payer-specific marginal and average costs and scale measures to be calculated. Findings point to significant differences in cost between the two payment forms. These may be due to the incentives embodied in the capitation provider payment or the less severe case-mix among insured patients arising from improved access to care for this group, or both. For both payment types there are important short-run economies of scale, which could be exploited through more intensive use of idle resources in health centres.

Community Health Centers↗