PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10272302

Preparing an emergency public relations plan.

Abstract

Many hospital disaster plans, while containing detailed procedures for dealing with an emergency situation, fail to include a well thought out emergency public relations plan. This omission can prove extremely troublesome in an actual emergency when there is little time to decide who is to serve as spokesperson for the institution, what policies should be followed and what conflicts or problems may arise. In this article, the author spells out what is required in advance to develop such a public relations plan.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A B Bernstein. 1985. Preparing an emergency public relations plan.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10272302/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of two commercially available portal monitors for emergency response.

The Human Monitoring Laboratory has compared two types (the P3 and the MiniSentry) of portal monitors that can be field deployed in response to an emergency. They can be used to screen persons for internal or external radioactive contamination by fission activation products (neither unit is capable of detecting alpha or beta radiation, and the amount of material required to alarm the monitors is unacceptably high for low energy x rays or gamma rays) following an incident involving the release of radioactive material (accidental or intentional). It was found that the P3 benefits from simplicity but requires slightly more activity to alarm than the MiniSentry, although for emergency response, the amount of activity that can be detected is far below a level where significant health effects will occur. The MiniSentry was found to have more capability than the P3, but these benefits also bring their own disadvantages. It was also found that the MiniSentry would be difficult to deploy in an outdoor setting whereas the P3 is well designed for a field setting. Despite the differences found, the HML has concluded that both have a distinct place in emergency monitoring. In the future, the HML plans to have both instruments ready for field deployment.

Disaster Planning↗