PubMed · 10275046
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D R Norcross. Developing effective public relations activities.. https://doi.org/10.1300/j026v03n02_24
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In September 2001, twelve neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients were found to be colonized with pigment-producing strains of Serratia marcescens. The UOEH Infection Control Group (ICG) committee investigated the source of this epidemic and carried out several remedial measures. Immediate investigation of both the environment and the hands of health care workers were enforced. The most likely means of transmission was thought to be from the hands contaminated with S. marcescens that was found on antiseptic cotton, kept in shared stainless steel canisters, used for wiping the patients' buttocks. Therefore, we suggested the following interventions: 1) abolish the stainless steel canisters, and prepare antiseptic cottons for each patient, 2) monitor cultures with some specimens for all patients in the NICU, 3) periodically investigate the environment, 4) enforce workers to wash and disinfect their hands before and after patient care, 5) use new gloves for each treatment, 6) re-examine and modify the caring procedures for inpatients by the nursing staff. In January 2002, this nosocomial colonization came to an end without any serious infection. One of the key points of this success was the quick response by the clinical staff and ICG committee members to the laboratory results of bacteriological examinations. Furthermore, the early investigation of reservoir and good communication between the clinical staff and ICG committee members mostly prevented this nosocomial colonization from becoming worse.
Measures to improve quality of care in hospitals should best be based upon the results of patient surveys. The present paper reports in the validation of a questionnaire originally developed in the US in 658 patients from two Swiss hospitals in a tertiary care setting. Questionnaires were sent out two weeks after release from hospital, more than 75 percent of questionnaires were returned. Based upon the experience that feedback of many single items rarely results in distinct actions to improve quality of care a factor analysis followed by an analysis of reliability was undertaken to validate the instrument and to reduce the amount of information, to help hospital officials to deal with the data, and finally to reduce the number of items in the questionnaire. Factor analysis revealed a 3-factor-solution based upon 25 out of 37 deficit-oriented questions, explaining 34.4 % of total variance. The factors can be described as: 1. Patient information (9 items; explained variance: 13.0 %); 2. Patient involvement and shared decision making (11 items; explained variance: 11.2 %); 3. Nursing quality (5 items; explained variance: 10.2 %). Cronbach's alpha values of these scales are 0.75, 0.72, and 0.69, respectively. As further analyses show, reducing the item pool does not lead to the loss of relevant information. Single wards show substantial differences in scores based on these factors (e.g. between 10 and 27 percent deficit in factor 2). The sensitivity of the factors in describing specific profiles of single wards will help to target measures to improve quality of care to those wards where improvement is most utterly needed.