PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10278850

Quality assurance. Issues and process.

Abstract

As a result of company-wide involvement in quality assurance we have been able to advance the concept of participatory management though the organization's base is centralized in Kalamazoo. Despite the great size and geographical span of UHCS, regional and office management staff across North America play an integral part in guiding our future. Our QA program has given field operations the opportunity to display to management their interest and desire to be involved in the overall process. Success in the home health care industry is due in large part to the work ethic of our employees and their desire to do their jobs in a truly professional manner. It is extremely important for a multiagency organization that all of its employees in every location, know that the company is only as good as its people. After all, an organization is perceived by the public through individual employees. Thus, expectation levels for health care employees must always be heightened. Quality improvement is an ongoing effort no matter how well we do it. We keep attempting to reduce the amount of rework or correction and to achieve higher levels of productivity. Employees of any healthcare organization, large or small, need to know that the organization cannot be satisfied with where it is today. We in the health service industry must be looking toward the care we can provide, better and more efficiently, tomorrow. Quality improvement is an ongoing effort, no matter how well we do it.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Wagner. 1986. Quality assurance. Issues and process.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10278850/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hospital-at-home versus in-patient hospital care.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-at-home is defined as a service that provides active treatment by health care professionals, in the patient's home, of a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital in-patient care, always for a limited period. Hospital-at-home has become a popular response to the increasing demand for acute hospital beds. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of hospital-at-home compared with in-patient hospital care for patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE to 1996, EMBASE to 1995, Cinahl to 1996, the Social Science Citation Index (1992 to 1995), EconLit (1969 to 1996), PsycLit (1987 to 1996), Sigle (1980 to 1995), the Medical Care supplement on economic literature (1979 to 1990), and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of hospital-at-home care compared with acute hospital in-patient care. The participants were patients aged 18 years and over. The outcomes were mortality, clinical complications, re-admissions, cost (to the patient and family, to general practice, to the hospital and to the community), hospital days saved from the provision of hospital-at-home, discharge destination from hospital-at-home, general and disease specific health status, functional status, psychological well-being, patient satisfaction, carer satisfaction, carer burden, and staff views (including the satisfaction of doctors working in primary care). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies were included involving 866 patients. All studies were small and lacked power. No statistically significant differences were detected for patient health outcomes. Patients discharged early from hospital to hospital-at-home following elective surgery expressed greater satisfaction with care than those who remained in hospital. Carers however expressed less satisfaction with hospital-at-home compared with hospital care. Only one trial formally tested for a difference in cost, with no statistically significant difference detected for overall health care costs. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to assess the effects of hospital-at-home on patient outcomes or the cost to the health service. Given the heterogeneity of what hospital-at-home encompasses and the uncertainty over its effects, future research should clearly specify the type of service being provided, both at home and at hospital, and the specific patient groups. Patient health outcomes, patient and carer satisfaction, and costs should be measured, and studies should include a formal, planned economic analysis. Studies should be large enough to detect important differences and to ensure generalisability of the results.

Home Care Services

Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients.

BACKGROUND: Stroke patients conventionally receive a substantial part of their rehabilitation in hospital. Services have now been developed which offer patients in hospital an early discharge with community-based rehabilitation (early supported discharge, ESD). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to establish the costs and effects of ESD services compared with conventional services. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Stroke Group Specialised Register was searched and supplemented with information from individual trialists. Searching was completed in March 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials recruiting stroke patients in hospital to receive either conventional care or any intervention which has provided rehabilitation and support in a community setting with an aim of reducing the duration of hospital care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers scrutinised trials and categorised them on their eligibility. Standardised information was then obtained from the primary trialists. Results were analysed for all trials and for two subgroups depending on whether the intervention was provided by a coordinated multidisciplinary team (coordinated ESD team) or not. MAIN RESULTS: Outcome data are currently available for four trials. Patients tended to be a selected elderly group with disability. Overall, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for death, death or institutionalisation, death or dependency at the end of scheduled follow up were 0.87 (0.39-1.93), 0.69 (0.36-1.31) and 0.88 (0.49-1. 57) respectively. Apparent benefits more evident in the three trials evaluating a coordinated ESD team. The ESD group showed significant reductions (P<0.001) in the length of hospital stay equivalent to approximately nine days. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: ESD services provided for a selected group of stroke patients can reduce the length of hospital stay. However, the relative risks and benefits and overall costs of such services remain unclear.

Home Care Services