PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10286478

Protocols for bedside testing. Part III.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Belsey, D M Baer. 1988. Protocols for bedside testing. Part III.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10286478/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Integrated microanalytical technology enabling rapid and automated protein identification.

Protein identification through peptide mass mapping by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has become a standard technique, used in many laboratories around the world. The traditional methodology often includes long incubations (6-24 h) and extensive manual steps. In an effort to address this, an integrated microanalytical platform has been developed for automated identification of proteins. The silicon micromachined analytical tools, i.e., the microchip immobilized enzyme reactor (mu-chip IMER), the piezoelectric microdispenser, and the high-density nanovial target plates, are the cornerstones in the system. The mu-chip IMER provides on-line enzymatic digestion of protein samples (1 microL) within 1-3 min, and the microdispenser enables subsequent on-line picoliter sample preparation in a high-density format. Interfaced to automated MALDI-TOF MS, these tools compose a highly efficient platform that can analyze 100 protein samples in 3.5 h. Kinetic studies on the microreactors are reported as well as the operation of this microanalytical platform for protein identification, wherein lysozyme, myoglobin, ribonuclease A, and cytochrome c have been identified with a high sequence coverage (50-100%).

Autoanalysis

Direct measurement of LDL-C in children: performance of two surfactant-based methods in a general pediatric population.

OBJECTIVES: Several pediatric advisory groups have recommended selective screening for dyslipidemia in children. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is measured clinically with the Friedewald calculation in fasting samples. Nonfasting measurement of LDL-C would be clinically useful in children. DESIGN AND METHODS: In the present study, we examine the performance of two surfactant-based direct LDL-C assays in paired samples, fasting and nonfasting, from 100 children. RESULTS: LDL-C in the fasting state was significantly lower with the Friedewald estimation: 2.43 +/- 0. 61 mmol/L, N-geneous (Genzyme Corp.) direct LDL-C: 2.30 +/- 0.59 mmol/L, and Roche (Roche Diagnostics) direct LDL-C: 2.32 +/- 0.57 mmol/L than with ultracentrifugation-dextran-sulfate-Mg(2+) precipitation (UC-DS): 2.47 +/- 0.64 mmol/L. Moreover, there was increased negative bias using nonfasting samples with N-geneous: 2. 25 +/- 0.56 mmol/L and Roche: 2.26 +/- 0.56 mmol/L compared with fasting UC-DS. Correlation with US-DS was highest for Friedewald (r = 0.974) and fasting N-geneous (r = 0.973), and lowest with nonfasting N-geneous (r = 0.849) and Roche in fasting (r = 0.891) and nonfasting samples (r = 0.747). The sensitivity at LDL-C concentration of 2.85 mmol/L for the two direct methods when either fasting or nonfasting samples were used, was lower than that obtained with Friedewald. CONCLUSION: Overall, these direct LDL-C assays demonstrated limited utility in screening children but may be useful in the management of lipid disorders.

Autoanalysis