PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10290384

Program eases decision making.

Abstract

A useful tool to assist management with complex multiple-criteria decision making is the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) microcomputer program. The AHP requires the user to judge the relative importance of each criterion, then specify a preference for each alternative relative to each criterion. The result is a prioritized overall ranking of the decision alternatives. Providence Ventures, Inc., used the AHP to assist a recent hospital client in selecting a magnetic resonance imaging vendor. A committee was appointed to narrow the decision alternatives down to three vendors, using the following criteria: price, technology, sitting, service, service contract, cryogen contract, and patient comfort. A key factor in the AHP is establishing priorities and preferences through the pairwise comparison procedure. The program asks the user, for example, if price and technology are equally important. If the response is no, the user tells the program which is more important and by how much, assigning a weight to each criterion. Similarly the user enters pairwise preferences for the vendors in regard to each criterion. The program then computes the overall decision. The entire process takes 10 to 15 minutes. A tool such as the AHP enables the manager and hospital to gain control of resources by saving time in reaching a decision, double checking other decisions for validity, using the model to audit department head decisions, and standardizing the decision-making process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Turri. 1988. Program eases decision making.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10290384/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An economic framework for evaluating a multileaf collimator.

OBJECTIVES: As health care budgets continue to face close scrutiny, any new acquisition must be evaluated for both costs and outcomes. This study was undertaken to demonstrate the application of an economic framework for the evaluation of a multileaf collimator as an example of a new technology that can have both quantifiable and nonquantifiable benefits for patients, staff, and cancer care institutions. METHODS: Using financial data from the Northeastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre (NEORCC) and a recognized staffing model, a commercial spreadsheet, developed to economically characterize the principal radiotherapy processes has been used to determine the net incremental annual cost of a multileaf collimator (MLC). RESULTS: The incremental annual cost of purchasing an MLC is estimated at approximately $85,000 (1997 CDN $). Without increasing patient throughput, this increases the average cost of a course of radiotherapy by approximately CDN $200. Savings can be accrued by decreasing mold room activity, increasing the hourly patient capacity on each treatment machine, and decreasing sick time due to strain injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical outcome of techniques facilitated by MLCs, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, are unknown at this time, an economic context within which to objectively evaluate this technology is presented. The framework presented suggests a method of quantifying outcome-justified expenditures, such as improved patient outcome and greater treatment flexibility, which, when offset against the incremental annual equipment cost, may be used to help justify the acquisition of multileaf technology.

Capital Expenditures↗

Aesthetic surgery economics: lessons from corporate boardrooms to plastic surgery practices.

Healthcare traditionally has been described as not conforming to the laws of economics. Consumers pay for aesthetic surgery directly, thus freeing it from the usual confounding factors and making it more likely to comply with the market forces explained by economics. Recent studies have demonstrated the ability of classic economics to analyze, predict, and optimize the financial environment of aesthetic surgery. This article describes economic principles and how they can be applied to aesthetic surgery. Some of the basic instruments of economics include the study of supply and demand, prices, and price elasticity; capital investments; communication and cooperation; and consumer cognitive limitations. Each of these tools offers plastic surgeons the opportunity to gain improved control of their financial environment.

Capital Expenditures↗