PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10290838

"Ethical workup" guides clinical decision making.

Abstract

Shared decision making, along with an explosion in costs and the alternatives associated with the technological revolution in medicine, has moved medical ethics from the status of a professional etiquette to that of a rigorous new discipline. A model for an "ethical workup," which medical professionals can use in healthcare setting, has four phases: expository, rational, volitional, and public. The expository phase includes medical factors, which are the most important for determining the right or wrong thing to do for a patient; ethical factors, which involve the interests, intuitions, and feelings of all those involved in a case; and socioeconomic factors, in which costs that create burdens on others become important, and in some cases decisive, considerations. The rational phase includes medical ethics categories, which determine the type of case one is facing; principles and moral guidelines, which justify decisions; and legal decisions and professional codes, which synthesize accepted wisdom about appropriate ethical behavior. The volitional phase includes ordering goods and values, which involves establishing priorities and weighing certain factors; ordering the principles, which reflect personal or institutional character and is influenced by religious and philosophical beliefs; and decision making, in which professionals consider a decision's impact on their profession, their facility, and themselves. The public phase includes making assumptions explicit, which means professionals should try to recognize underlying beliefs, admit their influence on preferred positions, and be sensitive to other perspectives and preferences; correlating initial feelings about right and wrong with the reasons supporting a decision; and organizing reasons for public communication.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F Drane. 1988. "Ethical workup" guides clinical decision making.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10290838/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical science, culture, and truth.

There is a fairly closed circle between culture, language, meaning, and truth such that the world of a given culture is a world understood in terms of the meanings produced in that culture. Medicine is, in fact, a subculture of a powerful type and has its own language and understanding of the range of illnesses that affect human beings. So how does medicine get at the truth of people and their ills in such a way as to escape its own limited constructions? There is a way out of the closed circle implicit in the idea of a praxis and the engagement with reality that is central to it and the further possibility introduced by Jacques Lacan that signification is never comprehensive in relation to the subject's encounter with the real. I will explore both of these so as to develop a conception of truth that is apt for the knowledge that arises in the clinic.

Bioethical Issues↗

The practice of health care: wisdom as a model.

Reasoning and judgement in health care entail complex responses to problems whose demands typically derive from several areas of specialism at once. We argue that current evidence- or value-based models of health care reasoning, despite their virtues, are insufficient to account for responses to such problems exhaustively. At the same time, we offer reasons for contending that health professionals in fact engage in forms of reasoning of a kind described for millennia under the concept of wisdom. Wisdom traditions refer to forms of deliberation which combine knowledge, reflection and life experience with social, emotional and ethical capacities. Wisdom is key in dealing with problems which are vital to human affairs but lack prescribed solutions. Uncertainty and fluidity must be tolerated in seeking to resolve them. We illustrate the application of wisdom using cases in psychiatry, where non-technical aspects of problems are often prominent and require more systematic analysis than conventional approaches offer, but we argue that our thesis applies throughout the health care field. We argue for the relevance of a threefold model of reasoning to modern health care situations in which multifaceted teamwork and complex settings demand wise judgement. A model based on practical wisdom highlights a triadic process with features activating capacities of the self (professional), other (patient and/or carers and/or colleagues) and aspects of the problem itself. Such a framework could be used to develop current approaches to health care based on case review and experiential learning.

Bioethical Issues↗