PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10293710

Energy efficiency today.

Abstract

These initiatives sponsored by the DH in concert with the NHS, have taken place since the issue of ENCODE 1 in November 1985, and have received very favourable reaction. A user survey carried out on ENCODE 1 and 2 in 1988, has consolidated this view and we are continuing to learn what those at the sharp end have been able to gain from it. On-going feed back is considered essential for the work to be fully effective. Evaluation and training has been done by SETRHA and South East Kent Health Authority at their training centre and these results will be fed back into ENCODE and to the National Training Centre at Falfield. One particular aspect apparent from these training sessions is the need for a structured approach to the use of ENCODE with special attention being given to the user of the computer software. ENCODES 1 and 2 have been sponsored by the DH/NHS and published by HMSO, and are the only comprehensive documents on energy efficiency in buildings available from Government Departments and as such they are now offered for sale world-wide. The Strategic Management Guide is due for publication this Spring as is also a complete revision of the ENCODE Computer Software. ENCODE software is compatible with the WIMS suite of software. A current joint venture with the WIMS Consortium is the development of a revised WIMS Energy Module to be called ENMATS (Energy Monitoring and Targeting System). An initial version will be available Mid 1989.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B C Oliver. 1989. Energy efficiency today.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10293710/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy--a Danish case study on waste paper.

The waste hierarchy is being widely discussed these days, not only by cost-benefit analysts, but a growing number of life cycle assessments (LCA) have also begun to question it. In this article, we investigate the handling of waste paper in Denmark and compare the present situation with scenarios of more waste being recycled, incinerated or consigned to landfill. The investigations are made in accordance with ISO 14040-43 and based on the newly launched methodology of consequential LCA and following the recent guidelines of the European Centre on Waste and Material Flows. The LCA concerns the Danish consumption of paper in 1999, totalling 1.2 million tons. The results of the investigation indicate that the waste hierarchy is reliable; from an environmental point of view recycling of paper is better than incineration and landfilling. For incineration, the reason for the advantage of landfilling mainly comes from the substitution of fossil fuels, when incinerators provide heat and electricity. For recycling, the advantage is related to the saved wood resources, which can be used for generating energy from wood, i.e., from renewable fuel which does not contribute to global warming.

Conservation of Energy Resources↗

Q and A: Bart Gordon.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Conservation of Energy Resources↗